Résumés
Résumé
Dans cette étude, des tests de compréhension en lecture d’un récit et d’un texte informatif ont été créés à partir de modèles théoriques communs et en suivant des étapes de conception précises (DeVellis, 2003). Ils furent administrés auprès de 401 élèves francophones de 8 ans. Les données recueillies ont subi des analyses par items, factorielles et multiniveaux. Ceci a permis d’examiner les taux de réussite aux tests, de mieux déterminer leurs composantes et de les comparer afin de comprendre leur portée pour la communauté praticienne et scientifique. Les résultats révèlent que les deux tests ont une structure factorielle semblable. Or, les questions ouvertes suscitant des inférences anaphoriques, causales et lexicales sont plus ardues à réussir, surtout dans le test utilisant un texte informatif. Ces nouveaux instruments peuvent contribuer à dégager des pistes d’enseignement et favoriser la transition entre le premier et le deuxième cycle du primaire en lecture.
Abstract
In this study, reading comprehension tests of narrative and informational text were created using common theoretical models and by following specific design steps (DeVellis, 2003). They were administered to 401 French-speaking 8-year-old students. The data collected underwent item, factorial and multilevel analyses. It led to examine the success rates for each test, to better determine their components and to compare them, in order to understand their usefulness for teachers and researchers. Results reveal that the two tests have a similar factorial structure. However, open-ended questions targeting anaphoric, causal and lexical inferences are more difficult to achieve, especially in the test using an informational text. These new instruments can help identify teaching avenues and promote a better transition between the first and second cycles of primary school in reading.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Adlof, S. M., Scoggins, J., Brazendale, A., Babb, S. et Petscher, Y. (2017). Identifying children at risk for language impairment or dyslexia with group-administered measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(12), 3507-3522. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0473
- Afflerbach, P., Cho, B.-Y., Crassas, M. E. et Kim, J.-Y. (2018). Best practices in reading assessment. Dans L.M. Morrow et L.B. Gambrell (dir.), Best practices in literacy instruction (6e éd., p. 309-333). Guilford Press.
- Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G. et McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children's comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951
- Bianco, M., Coda, M. et Gourgue, D. (2002). Compréhension. Éditions de la Cigale.
- Block, C. C., Parris, S. R., Reed, K. L., Whiteley, C. S. et Cleveland, M. D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 262-281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014883
- Catts, H. W. et Kamhi, A. G. (2017). Prologue: Reading comprehension is not a single ability. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-16-0033
- Clemens, N. H. et Fuchs, D. (2021). Commercially developed tests of reading comprehension: Gold standard or fool’s gold?Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.415
- Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E. et Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing 33(9), 2223-2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2
- Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. et Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.394
- Connor, C. M., Radach, R., Vorstius, C., Day, S. L., McLean, L. et Morrison, F. J. (2015). Individual differences in fifth graders’ literacy and academic language predict comprehension monitoring development: an eye-movement study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2014.943905
- DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2e éd.). SAGE Publications.
- Duke, N. K. et Roberts, K. L. (2010). The genre-specific nature of reading comprehension. Dans D. Wyse, R. Andrews, J. Hoffman (dir.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy teaching (p. 98-110). Routledge.
- Duplessis-Marcotte, F., Lapointe, R. et Caron, P.-O. (2022). Une introduction aux modèles de régressions multiniveaux avec R. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 18(2), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.18.2.p168.
- De Ketele, J. M. (2010). Ne pas se tromper d'évaluation. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 15(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfla.151.0025
- Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761-781. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000180
- Fejzo, A. (2021). The contribution of morphological awareness to vocabulary among L1 and L2 French-speaking 4th-graders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(3), 659–679
- Fountas, I. C. et Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Heinemann.
- Graesser, A. C., Ozuru, Y. et Sullins, J. (2010). What is a good question? Dans M. McKeown et L. Kucan (dir.), Bringing reading research to life (p. 112-141). Guilford Press.
- Irwin, J. W. (2007). Teaching reading comprehension processes (3e éd.). Prentice-Hall.
- Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S. et Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279
- Kim, Y. S. G. et Petscher, Y. (2021). Influences of individual, text, and assessment factors on text/discourse comprehension in oral language (listening comprehension). Annals of Dyslexia, 71(2), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-020-00208-8
- Kintsch, W. et Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. Dans Snowling, M.J. et Hulme, C. (dir.), Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology. The science of reading: A handbook. (p. 209-226). Blackwell Publishing.
- Landi, N. et Ryherd, K. (2017). Understanding specific reading comprehension deficit: A review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11(2), e12234. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12234
- Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J. et Deacon, S. H. (2019). Inferring meaning from meaningful parts: The contributions of morphological skills to the development of children's reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(1), 63-80.
- Ministère de l’Éducation, du loisir et du Sport (MELS). (2011). Cadre d’évaluation des apprentissages. Français langue d’enseignement. Enseignement primaire. Gouvernement du Québec.
- Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur (MEES). (2019). Liste orthographique. Document de référence. Gouvernement du Québec.
- Mokhtari, K. et Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
- Oakhill, J. V. et Cain, K. E. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
- O’Reilly, T., Weeks, J., Sabatini, J., Halderman, L. et Steinberg, J. (2014). Designing reading comprehension assessments for reading interventions: How a theoretically motivated assessment can serve as an outcome measure. Educational Psychology Review, 26(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9269-z
- Perfetti, C. et Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
- Perreault, S. (2017). Pourquoi la neige tombe-t-elle ? 7 faits et questions sur la neige. Les Explorateurs. Décembre. Bayard éditeur.
- Potocki, A., Bouchafa, H., Magnan, A. et Ecalle, J. (2014). Évaluation de la compréhension écrite de récits chez l’enfant de 7 à 10 ans : vers des profils de compreneurs. European review of applied psychology, 64(5), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2014.08.001
- Sabatini, J. P., Halderman, L. K., O'Reilly, T. et Weeks, J. P. (2016). Assessing comprehension in kindergarten through third grade. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(4), 334-355. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000104
- Sprenger-Charolles, L., Desrochers, A. et Gentaz, E. (2018). Apprendre à lire-écrire en français. Langue française,199(3), 51-67.
- Storch, S. A. et Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 934–947. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.934
- Suggate, S., Schaughency, E., McAnally, H. et Reese, E. (2018). From infancy to adolescence: The longitudinal links between vocabulary, early literacy skills, oral narrative, and reading comprehension. Cognitive Development, 47, 82-95
- Wharton-McDonald, R. et Swiger, S. (2009). Developing higher order comprehension in the middle grades. Dans Israel, S. E. et Duffey, G. G. (dir.) Handbook of research on reading comprehension (p. 510-530). Routledge.