Résumés
Abstract
This study aims to examine the characteristics of online mediation within public systems, focusing on two pivotal elements: the technological progression instigated by the Covid-19 pandemic that led to an almost full digitalisation of Brazil's judicial system and the subsequent implications of an emancipatory conflict transformation. The research engages social constructivist ontological and epistemology of the south as perspectives, thereby conducting an empirical inquiry into the modifications, aspects, and efficacy of mediation across two judicial districts in São Paulo, Brazil, specifically the cities of Piracicaba and Campinas. The paper underscores the role of mediation within the sphere of online dispute resolution (ODR) in Brazil's legal system, serving to enhance access to justice, expedite communicational changes, and address the limitations of digital mediation while ensuring the active involvement of all parties in the proceedings.
Furthermore, the study critically assesses and evaluates the use of mediation as a vital tool in national and international legal systems during the digital judiciary age. To achieve this, a comprehensive re-evaluation of the core principles of mediation is undertaken and juxtaposed with the challenges observed in these regional settings, thus unearthing various topics that necessitate further exploration. In summation, this study offers an insightful understanding of the modalities and regional practices of digital communication in mediation, positing it as a trailblazing approach to enhancing the efficacy of conflict resolution practices and furthering social, cultural, and academic transformation.
Keywords:
- Digital mediation,
- Judicial,
- Emancipatory,
- Communication
Résumé
Cette étude vise à examiner les caractéristiques de la médiation en ligne au sein des systèmes publics, en se concentrant sur deux éléments essentiels : la progression technologique provoquée par la pandémie de Covid-19 qui a conduit à une numérisation presque complète du système judiciaire brésilien et les implications ultérieures d’une politique d’émancipation. transformation des conflits. La recherche engage l’ontologie et l’épistémologie socioconstructivistes du sud comme perspectives, menant ainsi une enquête empirique sur les modifications, les aspects et l’efficacité de la médiation dans deux districts judiciaires de São Paulo, au Brésil, en particulier les villes de Piracicaba et Campinas. Le document souligne le rôle de la médiation dans le domaine du règlement des litiges en ligne (ODR) dans le système juridique brésilien, servant à améliorer l’accès à la justice, à accélérer les changements de communication et à remédier aux limites de la médiation numérique tout en garantissant l’implication active de toutes les parties dans le processus. procédure.
En outre, l’étude évalue de manière critique l’utilisation de la médiation en tant qu’outil essentiel dans les systèmes juridiques nationaux et internationaux à l’ère du système judiciaire numérique. Pour y parvenir, une réévaluation complète des principes fondamentaux de la médiation est entreprise et juxtaposée aux défis observés dans ces contextes régionaux, mettant ainsi au jour divers sujets qui nécessitent une exploration plus approfondie. En résumé, cette étude offre une compréhension approfondie des modalités et des pratiques régionales de la communication numérique dans la médiation, la posant comme une approche pionnière pour améliorer l’efficacité des pratiques de résolution des conflits et favoriser la transformation sociale, culturelle et académique.
Mots-clés :
- Médiation numérique,
- Judiciaire,
- Émancipateur,
- Communication
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- ADLER-NISSEN, R. and V. POULIOT, “Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya”, 2014, European Journal of International Relations, V20, N4, pp. 889–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113512702.
- AHMED, S., TheCulturalPoliticsofEmotion, 2a ed, Edinburgh University Press, 2014.
- ARAÚJO, S. “Epistemic (in)social justice. Can the right include without homogenising?” Multiculturalism and Law, Centro de Estudos Judiciátios da Universidade de Coimbra. 2022. pp. 09-15, online, https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/100187/1/A%20in_justica%20social%20epistemica.pdf.
- BAELE, S. J., Lewis, D. Hoeffler, A., Sterck, O. C., and Slingeneyer, T. “The Ethics of Security Research: An Ethics Framework for Contemporary Security Studies”, 2018, International Studies Perspectives, V19, N2, pp. 105-127, online, https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekx003.
- BARASH, D. P. Approachestopeace:areaderinpeacestudies, 4ª ed, New York, Oxford University Press, 2018.
- BARTOS, O. J. and Wehr P. E. Usingconflicttheory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
- BRAZIL. ConstitutionoftheFederativeRepublicofBrazil, 1988, online, https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicaocompilado.htm.
- BRAZIL, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUSTICE, Justice in Numbers Report, Brasília, 2021, online, www.cnj.jus.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/relatorio-justica-em-justica-em-numeros2021-12.pdf.
- BERCOVITCH, J. “Mediation and Conflict Resolution”, in Bercovitch, Kremenyuk, & Zartman (eds.), TheSagehandbookofconflictresolution, London, Sage Publications, 2009, pp. 340-357.
- BERCOVITCH, J. Theoryandpracticeofinternationalmediation:selectedessays, Routledge, 2011.
- BIRKS, M., and Mills, J. Grounded theory:apractical guide. Sage Publications, 2015.
- EBNER, N., and Zeleznikow, J. Fairness, “Trust and Security in Online Dispute Resolution”, 2015, JournalofPublicLawandPolicy, V36, N2, pp. 143-160, online, http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/jplp/vol36/iss2/6.
- FREIRE, P. EducationasthePracticeofFreedom, Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra, 1967. FREIRE, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, Herder and Herder, 1970.
- FUX, L. “100% digital judgment and the vocation of modern jurisdictional activity.” In FUX, Ávila and Cabral (eds.), TechnologyandMultiportJusticeTheoryandPractice, Editora Foco, 2021, pp. 66 -78).
- GEWURZ, I. G. “(Re)designing mediation to address the nuances of power imbalance.”, 2001, Conflict Resolution Quarterly,V19, N2, pp. 135-162, online, https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3890190203.
- GUZZINI, S. Power,RealismandConstructivism, 1ª ed., Routledge, 2013.
- HOFFMANN, J. “Conceptualizing communication for peace.”, 2014, Peacebuilding, V2, N1, pp. 100-117, online, https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2013.866461.
- KATSH, M. E. and Rabinovich-Einy, Orna,Digitaljustice:technologyandtheinternetof disputes, 1a ed, New York, Oxford University Press, 2017.
- KESSLER, O. “On Norms, Communication and the Problem of Practice.”, in Kessler, O, Hall, R. B., Lynch, C. and Onuf, N. (eds.), On Rules, Politics and Knowledge: Friedrich Kratochwil,InternationalRelationsandDomesticAffairs. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 84-101.
- KRIESBERG, L, “Connecting theory and practice in the peace and conflict studies field” in Byrne et al., eds, Routledge companion to peace and conflict studies, London, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2020, pp. 35-44.
- LEDERACH, J. P. Themoralimagination:theartandsoulofbuildingpeace, New York, Oxford University Press, 2005.
- LEDERACH, J. P. Thelittlebookofconflicttransformation, New York, Good Books, 2014.
- LEWIS, T., and Umbreit, M. “A Humanistic Approach to Mediation and Dialogue: An Evolving Transformative Practice”, 2015, ConflictResolutionQuarterly, V33, N1, 20 pp. 3-17. 2015, online, https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21130.
- MAC GINTY, R, EverydayPeace, Oxford University Press, 2021.
- MERCER, J. (2014). “Feeling like a state: social emotion and identity”. International Theory, V6, N3, pp. 515-535, online, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971914000244.
- MORIN, E. Thesevenknowledgesnecessaryfortheeducationofthefuture.Brasília, Publisher Cortez, 2000.
- MORIN, E. Earth-Homeland, Porto Alegre, Publisher Sulina, 2003.
- MORRIS, R. Storiesoftransformativejustice. Canadian Scholars’ Press, 2000.
- NUNES, D. “Technological Turn in Procedural Law and stages of the use of technology in procedural law: would it be possible to adapt the procedure by technology?”, in Nunes and Lucon (eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Procedural Law: the impacts of the technological turn in procedural law, Salvador, Juspodivm, 2021, pp. 17-32.
- RABINOVICH-EINY, O. “Technology’s Impact: The Quest for a New Paradigm for Accountability”, 2006, in MediationHarvardNegotiationLawReview, V11, N253, pp. 253- online, https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/haneg11&div=7&id=&page.
- RAINES, S. S., Poitras, J., and Pokhrel, S. “Mediation as a Profession: Challenges that Professional Mediators Face”, 2013, ConflictResolution Quarterly, V31, N1, pp. 79-97, online, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2356429.
- SALOMÃO, L. F. (ed). Technologyappliedtothemanagementofconflictswithinthe scope of the Judiciary. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro, CIAPJ/FGV, 2022, online, https://ciapj.fgv.br/sites/ciapj.fgv.br/files/relatorio_ia_2fase.pdf
- SANTOS, B. de S. EpistemologiesoftheSouth:justiceagainstepistemicide, Routledge. 2016.
- SANTOS, B. de S. O fim do império cognitivo a afirmação das epistemologias do sul, 1ª ed., Grupo Autêntica, 2019.
- SANTOS, B. de S. Towardanewlegalcommonsense:law,globalization,and emancipation, 3ª ed, Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- SIMMEL, G. TheSociologyofConflict. 1904, American Journal of Sociology, V9, N4, pp. 49-525, online, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2762175.
- SPENGLER, F. M. Thestate-jurisdictionincrisisandtheinstitutionofconsensus:for another culture in the treatment of conflicts, Doctoral Thesis, 2007, online, www.repositorio.jesuita.org.br/handle/UNISINOS/2478
- SUSSKIND, R. E. Onlinecourtsandthefutureofjustice. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019, online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838364.001.0001.