Résumés
Abstract
In Saskatchewan, school divisions have been largely tasked with creating classroom-based assessment policy as, until very recently, the province lacked a current, Ministry-produced guiding document. Using an inductive and qualitative approach to summative content analysis, informed by a policy analysis framework, this project focused on school division administrative policies (n=26) to ascertain their alignment with contemporary assessment principles. Three principles—standards-based assessment, reliability and validity, and fairness and equity—and seven sub-principles—ongoing/continuous, transparent, (involves) stakeholders, (excludes) extraneous/arbitrary factors, triangulation, differentiation, and inclusion—served as the focus of analysis, with particular attention given to how clearly and consistently principles were addressed.
Keywords:
- provincial,
- contemporary assessment principles,
- administrative policies,
- policy analysis
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Alonzo, A. (2020). Defining trustworthiness for teachers’ multiple uses of classroom assessment results. In S. M. Brookhart & J. McMillan (Eds.), Classroom assessment and educational measurement (pp. 120–145). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507533
- Balicki, C. (2016). Teacher perceptions (K-8) of data-driven decision making processes: A case study of one urban Saskatchewan school district. [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. University of Saskatchewan.
- Basterra, M. del R., Trumbull, E., & Solano-Flores, G. (2010). Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. Routledge.
- Belisle, M. (2012). Maintaining the “achievement gap”: How the discourses of wide-scale assessments marginalize students and preserve the educational status quo. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Regina.
- Birenbaum, M. (2016). Assessment culture versus testing culture: The impact on assessment for learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 275–292). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_16
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012). The reliability of assessments. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 243–263). Sage Publications, Inc. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808
- Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 429-458.
- Brookhart, S. M. (2015). Graded achievement, tested achievement, and validity. Educational Assessment, 20(4), 268-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1093928
- Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, M. T., & Welsh, M. E. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 803-848. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
- Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 11(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
- Brown, S., Race, P., & Smith, B. (2004). 500 tips on assessment. Routledge.
- Buckley-Walker, K., & Lipscombe, K. (2021). Validity and the design of classroom assessment in teacher teams. Australian Educational Researcher, 49(2), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00437-9
- Buhagiar, M. A. (2007). Classroom assessment within the alternative assessment paradigm: Revisiting the territory. Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170701292174
- Campbell, C. (2013). Research on teacher competency in classroom assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 71–84). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Cooper, D. (2007). Talk about assessment: Strategies to improve learning. Nelson.
- Davies, A. (2020). Making classroom assessment work (4th ed.). Connect 2 Learning.
- De Lisle, J. (2016). Unravelling continuous assessment practice: Policy implications for teachers’ work and professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.06.004
- DeLuca, C., Braund, H., Valiquette, A., & Cheng, L. (2017). Grading policies and practices in Canada: A landscape study. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 184, 4–22.
- Deluca, C., & Klinger, D. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 419-438.
- Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully
- implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433-479.
- Desimone, L., Smith, T., Hayes, S., & Frisvold, D. (2005). Beyond accountability and average mathematics scores: Relating state education policy attributes to cognitive achievement domains. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(4), 5-18.
- Elwood, J., & Lundy, L. (2010). Revisioning assessment through a children’s rights approach: Implications for policy, process and practice. Research Papers in Education, 25(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.498150
- Forman, J., & Damschroder, L. (glish). Qualitative content analysis. In L. Jacoby & L. Siminoff (Eds.), Empirical methods for bioethics: A primer (pp. 39-62). Elsevier.
- Government of Saskatchewan. (2022a). Provincial exams. https://www.saskatchewan.ca/residents/education-and-learning/departmental-exams
- Government of Saskatchewan. (2022b). Student assessment. https://www.saskatchewan.ca/residents/education-and-learning/prek-12-education-early-learning-and-schools/student-assessment
- Guskey, T. R. (2009a). Grading policies that work against standards...and how to fix them. In T. R. Guskey (Ed.), Practical solutions for serious problems in standards-based grading (pp. 9–26). Corwin Press.
- Guskey, T. R. (Ed.). (2009b). Practical solutions for serious problems in standards-based grading. Corwin Press.
- Hébert C. & LeNouail, K. (in press). “Beg, Borrow, and Steal”: School Division Perspectives of Assessment Policy Creation in Saskatchewan. Alberta Journal of Educational Research.
- Hellsten, L. M., Noonan, B., Preston, J. P., & Prytula, M. P. (2013). Principals’ perceptions of assessment leadership: A study of the assessment practices of school principals in Saskatchewan (Canada). International Studies in Educational Administration, 40(3), 57-75.
- Heritage, M. (2013). Gathering evidence of student understanding. In J. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 179–196). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(1277), 1277-1288.
- Jung, L. A. (2009). The challenges of grading and reporting in special education: An inclusive grading model. In T. R. Guskey (Ed.), Practical solutions for serious problems in standards-based grading (pp. 27–40). Corwin Press.
- Kane, M., & Wools, S. (2020). Perspectives on the validity of classroom assessment. In S. M. Brookhart & J. H. McMillan (Eds.), Classroom assessment and educational measurement (pp. 11–26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507533
- Kelly, D. M., & Brandes, G. M. (2008). Equitable classroom assessment: Promoting self-development and self-determination. Interchange, 39(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-008-9041-8
- Koh, K., DePass, C., & Steel, S. (2019). Developing teachers’ assessment literacy: A tapestry of ideas and inquiries. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004385672
- Kondracki, N., Wellman, N., & Amundson, D. (2002). Content analysis: Review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34(4), 224-230.
- McDonough, K. (2005). A framework for the development of school division operational policies and procedures. https://saskschoolboards.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/05-04.pdf
- McMillan, J. (2007). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction. Pearson Education Inc.
- O’Connor, K. (2011). A repair kit for grading: 15 fixes for broken grades (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
- O’Connor, K. (2018). How to grade for learning: Linking grades to standards (4th ed.). Corwin Press.
- Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/growsuccess.pdf
- Parkes, J. (2013). Reliability in classroom assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 107–125). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Patterson, J. A., Campbell, J. K., Johnson, D. M., Marx, G., & Whitener, M. (2013). Using policy attributes theory to examine comprehensive school reform implementation in two Title I middle schools. Planning and Changing, 44(1/2), 36-55.
- Pellegrino, J., & Wilson, M. (2015). Assessment of complex cognition: Commentary on the design and validation of assessments. Theory Into Practice, 54(3), 263-273.
- Popham, J. (2005). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (4th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
- Porter, A. C. (1994). National standards and school improvement in the 1990s: Issues and promise. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 421-449.
- Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2019). Conceptualising fairness in classroom assessment: exploring the value of organisational justice theory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 26(5), 584-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1593105
- Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (1991). Student evaluation: A teacher handbook. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED351296&site=ehost-live
- Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2010). Renewed curricula: Understanding outcomes. https://pubsaskdev.blob.core.windows.net/pubsask-prod/72117/72117-Renewed_Curricula.pdf
- Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2022a). K-12 school divisions in Saskatchewan. https://www.saskatchewan.ca/residents/education-and-learning/prek-12-education-early-learning-and-schools/k-12-school-divisions-in-saskatchewan#public
- Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2022b). Supporting student assessment in Saskatchewan. https://www.edonline.sk.ca/bbcswebdav/pid-721379-dt-content-rid-10768730_1/xid-10768730_1
- Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2022c). Supporting students with additional needs. https://www.saskatchewan.ca/residents/education-and-learning/prek-12-education-early-learning-and-schools/supporting-students-with-additional-needs#inclusion-and-intevention-plans
- Simon, M., Chitpin, S., & Yahya, R. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ thinking about student assessment issues. International Journal of Education, 2(2), 1-20.
- Solano-Flores, G. (2010). Assessing the cultural validity of assessment practices: An introduction. In M. del R. Basterra, E. Trumbull, & G. Solano-Flores (Eds.), Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 3–21). Routledge.
- Stobart, G. (2012). Validity in formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 233–242). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Sunwest School Division (2022). Assessment process. https://resourcebank.ca/hubs/Assessment
- Government of Saskatchewan. (2017, September 1). The School Division Administration Regulations being Chapter E-0.2 Reg 26 as amended by Saskatchewan Regulations 27/2018. https://pubsaskdev.blob.core.windows.net/pubsask-prod/104103/E0-2r26.pdf
- Tierney, R. D. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 125–144). Sage Publications, Inc.
- Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. ASCD. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/siteASCD/publications/assessment-and-di-whitepaper.pdf
- Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010