Résumés
Abstract
This paper utilizes an ALA resolution from 2016 and the resulting arguments on an ALA public forum to analyze the profession of librarianship from a perspective informed by Pierre Bourdieu’s theories. Drawing on scholarship from sociology, organizational studies, and LIS, I argue that the concept of a profession is a form of symbolic capital working within multiple fields of power. Analyzing librarianship with this framework enables us to identify the internal and external battles being waged over control of symbolic capital within fields of power, and ask why we value “the profession” to such a degree. Within the profession, professionals, para-professionals, and managers are constantly attempting to shore up or acquire additional symbolic capital. Externally, professions are struggling to maintain their symbolic capital in relation to each other; some professions, like medicine and law, have been more adept at consecrating cultural, social and economic capital into symbolic capital. Ultimately, this approach makes clear that the concept of “a profession” is neither absolute nor neutral; it is a constructed, deeply historical socio-cultural classification system that has been embedded into our collective understanding of how labour is valued. Ultimately, bolstering support behind the notion of a “profession” might not be the most prudent course of action for librarians going forward; in fact, I’ll suggest that uncritically supporting the “profession” goes against the philosophical tenets that librarians are purported to uphold.
Keywords:
- ALA,
- Bourdieu,
- profession,
- professionalization,
- sociology
Résumé
Cet article utilise une résolution de l'ALA de 2016 et les arguments qui en résultaient lancés pour et contre sur un forum public de l'ALA comme point de départ pour analyser la profession de bibliothécaire dans une perspective éclairée par les théories de Pierre Bourdieu. En nous appuyant sur des textes en sociologie, études organisationnelles et en bibliothéconomie, je soutiens que le concept de profession est une forme de capital symbolique oeuvrant à travers multiples domaines de pouvoir. Analyser la bibliothéconomie à travers ce cadre nous permet d'identifier les luttes internes et externes menées pour le contrôle du capital symbolique dans les champs de pouvoir, et de nous demander pourquoi nous valorisons autant « la profession ». Au sein de la profession, les professionnel.le.s, les para-professionnel.le.s et les gestionnaires tentent constamment de consolider ou d'acquérir du capital symbolique supplémentaire. De l'extérieur, plusieurs professions peinent à maintenir leur capital symbolique les unes par rapport aux autres ; certaines professions, tels la médecine et le droit, ont été plus habiles à consacrer du capital culturel, social et économique en capital symbolique. En fin de compte, cette approche montre clairement que le concept de « profession » n'est ni absolu ni neutre ; il s'agit d'un système de classification socioculturelle construit et profondément historique qui s'est incorporé à notre compréhension collective de la valorisation du travail. Ultimement, renforcer le soutien à la notion de « profession » n'est peut-être pas la ligne la plus prudente pour les bibliothécaires à l'avenir ; en fait, je suggérerai que soutenir sans critique la « profession » va à l'encontre des principes philosophiques que les bibliothécaires sont censé.e.s défendre.
Mots-clés :
- ALA,
- Bourdieu,
- profession,
- professionnalisation,
- sociologie
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- ALA Board of Directors. 2016. “Draft Resolution on the Education Requirements for Future ALA Executive Directors.” Accessed July 20, 2023. http://connect.ala.org/communities/community-home/digestviewer/viewthread?MessageKey=74D7B72F-C0B6-4C79-9BB5-6DF707F1B451
- Albright, J., D. Hartman, and J. Widin, eds. 2018. Bourdieu’s field theory and the social sciences. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
- Bayless, S. 1977. “Librarianship is a Discipline.” Library Journal 102: 1715-1717.
- Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
- Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, edited by J. Richardson, 241-258. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
- Bouthillier, France. 2000. “The Meaning of Service: Ambiguities and Dilemmas for Public Service Library Providers.” Library and Information Science Research 22, 243-272.
- Budd, John and Lynn Connaway. 1998. “Discursive Content and Discursive Power in U.S. Library and Information Service Education.” Libri 48, 140-152.
- Colley, Helen and Frédérique Guéry. 2015. “Understanding new hybrid professions: Bourdieu, illusio and the case of public service interpreters.” Cambridge Journal of Education 45, 113- 131.
- Cronin, Blaise and Debora Shaw. 2002. “Banking (on) Different Forms of Symbolic Capital.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 1267-1270.
- Estabrook, Leigh. 1981. “Labor & Librarians: The divisiveness of professionalism.” Library Journal 106(2), 125-127.
- Hakim, Catherine. 2004. Key Issues in Women’s Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women’s Employment. Routledge-Cavendish: London, UK.
- Harris, Roma. 1992. Librarianship: The Erosion of a Woman’s Profession. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
- Hicks, Deborah. 2014. Technology and Professional Identity of Librarians: The Making of a Cybrarian. Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
- Jain, S. 2013. “Bourdieu’s sociology: A post-positivist science.” Thesis Eleven, 117(1), 101-116.
- Knox, Emily J. M. 2014. “Supporting Intellectual Freedom: Symbolic Capital and Practical Philosophy in Librarianship.” The Library Quarterly 84(1), 8–21.
- Kuhlman, A. F. 1938. “Librarianship as a Profession.” Peabody Journal of Education 16(2), 71-80.
- Lonergan, David. 2009. “Is librarianship a profession?” Community & Junior College Libraries 15, 119-122.
- Noordengraaf, Mirko and Willem Schinkel. 2011. “Professional Capital Contested: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Conflicts between Professionals and Managers.” Journal of Comparative Sociology 10, 97-125.
- Navarro, Z. 2006. “In Search of a Cultural Interpretation of Power: The Contribution of Pierre Bourdieu.” IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 11–22. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00319.x.
- Pynes, Joan. 2000. “Are Women underrepresented as Leaders of Nonprofit Organizations?” Review of Public Personnel Administration 20, 35-49.
- Schinkel, Willem and Mirko Noordengraaf. 2011. “Professionalism as Symbolic Capital: Materials for a Bourdieusian Theory of Professionalism.” Journal of Comparative Sociology 10, 67-96.
- Stauffer, Suzanne M. 2016. “This Work Calls for Men: The Social Construction of Professionalism and Professional Education for Librarianship.” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 57, 311-324.
- Tewell, E. 2015. “A Decade of Critical Information Literacy: A Review of the Literature.” Communications in Information Literacy, 9(1), 2.
- Wien, C. N., & Dorch, B. F. 2018. “Applying Bourdieu’s Field Theory to Analyze the Changing Status of the Research Librarian.” Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 28(1), 1–17. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10236