Abstracts
Abstract
This article explores the potential for critical discourse analysis to provide insight into the language principals use to describe the adult relationships within schools. Unpacking the discourses of leadership may shed some light on how language strategically shapes the thoughts and actions of principals. In particular, the invoking of “family” to conceptualize staff relations is analyzed from a critical discourse analysis approach. Drawing on this analysis, the author offers cautions regarding how such poignant metaphors can serve as control strategies for sanctioning teacher behaviour.
Résumé
Dans cet article, les auteurs explorent le potentiel de l’analyse critique du discours comme outil permettant de mieux comprendre le vocabulaire utilisé par les directeurs pour décrire les relations prévalant entre les adultes dans les écoles. Déconstruire les messages de leadership peut apporter un éclairage intéressant sur la façon dont le langage façonne la pensée et les actions des directeurs. Plus précisément, la référence à la notion de famille pour décrire les relations du personnel est analysée d’un point de vue critique, en utilisant l’approche d’analyse critique du discours. Se basant sur cette analyse, les auteurs invitent à la prudence, soulignant que de telles métaphores poignantes peuvent être utilisées comme stratégies de contrôle pour sanctionner le comportement des enseignants.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record. 104(3), 421-455.
- Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation (J. Barnes, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Bollingen Foundation.
- Bossard, J.H.S. (1956). The large family system: An original study in the sociology of family behavior. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. C. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.
- Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990) Reproduction in education, society and culture, 2nd edition. London: Sage.
- Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage
- Conway, J. F. (2003). The Canadian family in crisis: 5th edition. Toronto: James Lorimer & Company.
- Cranston, J. (2007). Holding the reins of the professional learning community: Principals’ perceptions of the normative imperative to develop schools as professional learning communities. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
- Crow, G. M, Hausman, C. S., & Scribner, J. P. (2002). Reshaping the role of the school principal. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 189-210). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Earl, L. M. & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Forward, G. L. (2001). Servant or CEO? A metaphor analysis of leadership in a Nonprofit context. The New Jersey Journal of Communication, 9(2), 145-165.
- Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Free Press.
- Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
- Green, R. (2005). Practicing the art of leadership: A problem-based approach to implementing the ISLLC standards, 2nd ed. Toronto: Pearson.
- Hart, C. (2008). Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(2), 91-106.
- Hess, R. D. & Handel, G. (1994). The family as psychosocial organization. In G. Handel & G. G. Whitchurch (Eds.), The psychosocial interior of family, 4th edition (pp. 3-18). Hawthorne, NY: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
- Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: What are they and why are they important. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory Issues… about change, 6(1), 1-9. Retrieved September 28, 2005 from www.sedl.org/change/issues/issues61.html
- Hord, S. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S. Hord (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities (pp. 5-14). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (2007). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, 8th ed. Toronto: McGraw Hill.
- King, K. F. (1983). Recognizing family strengths. In National symposium of family strengths (pp. 48-60), Oakville, ON: Sheridan College.
- Laidlaw, L. (2006, Winter). Learning to “do family” differently: Towards more complex notions of family, culture, and schooling. Journal of the Canadian Associations for Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 41-54.
- Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How Liberals and Conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Macleod, C. (2002). Deconstructive discourse analysis: extending the methodological conversation. South African Journal of Psychology, 32(1), 17-25.
- McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R.L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How Conservatives and Liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4). 978-990.
- McCourt, W. (1997). Using metaphors to understand and change organizations; A critique of Gareth Morgan’s approach. Organizational Studies, 18(3).
- McGregor, S. L. T. (2003). Critical discourse analysis: A primer. Kappa Omicron Nu FORUM 15(1), Retrieved April 15, 2010 from http://www.kon.org/archives/forum/forum15-1.html
- Milan, A., Vezina, M., & Wells, C. (2007). Family portrait: Continuity and change in Canadian families and households in 2006, 2006 Census. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
- Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. The Netherlands: GPB Gorter BV, Steenwijk.
- Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2001). Building capacity for a learning community. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 19(2001). Retrieved December 11, 2008 from www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/mitchellandsackney.html.
- Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Murphy, J. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 65-82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Newman, D. M. & Grauerholz, E. (2002). Sociology of families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
- Ontario Human Rights Commission. (2006). The cost of caring: Report on the consultation on discrimination on the basis of family status. Retrieved April 16, 2009 from http://www.ohrc.on.ca
- Pelligrini, E. K. & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566-593.
- Reagan, T. (1993). Educating the “reflective practitioner”: The contribution of philosophy of education. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(4), 191-196.
- Rigney, D. (2001). The metaphorical society: An invitation to social theory. Lanham, MD: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Rosenblatt, P. C. (1994). Metaphors of family systems theory. New York: The Guilford Press.
- Sanday, P. R. (1981). Female power and male dominance: On the origins of sexual inequality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
- Sergiovanni, T. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Sergiovanni, T. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Shakeshaft, C. (1999). The struggle to create a more gender-inclusive profession. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 99-118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Sikka, T. (2008). Pragmatics, poststructuralism, and hermeneutics: An examination of discursive-consensus formation and its ethical implications. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(2008), 227-243.
- Stack, M. (2000). Testing, testing, read all about it: Canadian press coverage of the PISA results. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(1), 49-69.
- Starratt, R. (1990). The drama of schooling, the schooling of drama. New York: Falmer Press.
- Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
- Tagiuri, R. & Davis, J. A. (1992). On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5(1), 43-62.
- Terry, R. (1993). Authentic leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Todd, E., & Garrioch, D. (1989). The explanation of ideology: Family structure and social systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
- van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage.
- van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Principles of critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 300-317). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of critical discourse analyses, pp. 352-371. Blackwell Reference Online. Retrieved April 29, 2009 from www.blackwellreference.com
- van Leeuwen, T. (1996) The Representation of Social Actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 33-70). London: Routledge.
- Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. New York: Wiley.