Abstracts
Abstract
Animal and environmental ethics should converge on the following three value judgments: natural ecosystems generally involve more good than harm; predation in nature tends to yield positive net benefits; and, at least on a global scale, livestock farming is destroying more value than it is creating. But the ecocentric criteria of environmental ethics and the sentientist criteria of animal ethics may have divergent implications for capitalism’s main effect on the world: the collapse of wild nature due to explosive growth in the human economy. Sentientism risks counting this effect as a net gain, whereas ecocentrism surely rates it a massive net loss. While supporting the above claims, I show how they fit into a larger argument in favour of the broader, ecocentric value theory of environmental ethics and against the narrower, sentientist axiology of animal ethics.
Résumé
Les éthiques animale et environnementale devraient converger vers les trois jugements de valeur suivants: les écosystèmes naturels impliquent généralement plus de bien que de mal, la prédation dans la nature a tendance à produire des avantages nets positifs et, au moins à l’échelle mondiale, l’élevage animal détruit plus de valeur qu’il n’en crée. Mais les critères écocentriques de l’éthique environnementale et les critères de l’éthique animale fondés sur la sentience pourraient avoir des implications divergentes sur l’effet principal du capitalisme sur le monde: l’effondrement de la nature sauvage dû à la croissance explosive de l’économie humaine. Le sentientisme risque de considérer cet effet comme un gain net, alors que l’écocentrisme le considère sûrement comme une perte nette massive. Tout en soutenant les affirmations ci-dessus, je montre comment elles s’intègrent dans un argument plus large en faveur d’une théorie de la valeur écocentrique plus englobante propre à l’éthique environnementale et contre l’axiologie sentientiste plus étroite de l’éthique animale.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Baril, Lisa M., A. J. Hansen, Roy Renkin, and Rick Lawrence, “Songbird Response to Increased Willow (Salix Spp.) Growth in Yellowstone’s Northern Range,” Ecological Applications, vol. 21, no. 6, 2011, p. 2283-2296.
- Brashares, Justin S., Peter Arcese, Moses K. Sam, Peter B. Coppolillo, A. R. E. Sinclair and Andrew Balmford, “Bushmeat Hunting, Wildlife Declines, and Fish Supply in West Africa,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5699, 2004, p. 1180-1183.
- Cafaro, Phil, “Valuing Wild Nature” in Stephen M. Gardiner and Allen Thompson (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University, 2017, p. 125-138.
- Callicott, John Baird, “Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 2, no. 4, 1980, p. 311-338.
- Callicott, John Baird, “How Ecological Collectives Are Morally Considerable,” in Stephen M. Gardiner and Allen Thompson (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University, 2017, p. 113-124.
- D’Arcy, Stephen, “Environmentalism as if Winning Mattered: A Self-Organization Strategy,” https://publicautonomy.org/2014/09/17/environmentalism, 2014.
- Darimont, Chris T., Caroline H. Fox, Heather M. Bryan, and Thomas E. Reimchen, “The Unique Ecology of Human Predators,” Science, vol. 349, no. 6250, 2015, p. 858-860.
- Dinerstein, Eric, David Olson, Anup Joshi, Carly Vynne, Neil D. Burgess, Eric Wikramanayake, Nathan Hahn, Suzanne Palminteri, Prashant Hedao, Reed Noss, Matt Hansen, Harvey Locke, Erle C. Ellis, Benjamin Jones, Charles Victor Barber, Randy Hayes, Cyril Kormos, Vance Martin, Eileen Crist, Wes Sechrest, Lori Price, Jonathan E. M. Baillie, Don Weeden, Kierán Suckling, Crystal Davis, Nigel Sizer, Rebecca Moore, David Thau, Tanya Birch, Peter Potapov, Svetlana Turubanova, Alexandra Tyukavina, Nadia De Souza, Lilian Pintea, José C. Brito, Othman A. Llewellyn, Anthony G. Miller, Annette Patzelt, Shahina A. Ghazanfar, Jonathan Timberlake, Heinz Klöser, Yara Shennan-Farpón, Roeland Kindt, Jens-Peter Barnekow Lillesø, Paulo Van Breugel, Lars Graudal, Maianna Voge, Khalaf F. Al-Shammari, And Muhammad Saleem, “An Ecoregion-Based Approach to Protecting Half the Terrestrial Realm”, BioScience, vol. 67, no. 6, 2017, p. 534-545.
- Dirzo, Rodolpho, Hillary S. Young, Mauro Galetti, Gerardo Ceballos, Nick J. B. Isaac and Ben Collen, “Defaunation in the Anthropocene,” Science, vol. 345, no. 6195, 2014, p. 401-406.
- Donaldson, Sue and Will Kymlicka, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, New York, Oxford University, 2011.
- Hallmann, Caspar A., Martin Sorg, Eelke Jongejans, Henk Siepel, Nick Hofland, Heinz Schwan, Werner Stenmans, Andreas Müller, Hubert Sumser, Thomas Hörren, Dave Goulson and Hans de Kroon, “More than 75 Percent Decline over 27 Years in Total Flying Insect Biomass in Protected Areas,” Public Library of Science ONE, vol. 12, 2017, e0185809.
- Hargrove, Eugene C. (ed.), The Animal Rights/Environmental Ethics Debate: The Environmental Perspective, New York, SUNY, 1992.
- Horta, Oscar, “Debunking the Idyllic View of Natural Processes: Population Dynamics and Suffering in the Wild,” Telos, vol. 17, no. 1, 2010a, p. 73-88.
- Horta, Oscar, “The Ethics of the Ecology of Fear against the Nonspeciesist Paradigm: A Shift in the Aims of Intervention in Nature,” Between the Species, vol. 10, 2010b, p. 163-187.
- Horta, Oscar, “Animal Suffering in Nature: The Case for Intervention,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 39, no. 3, 2017, p. 261-279.
- Hurka, Thomas, “Value and Population Size,” Ethics, vol. 93, no. 3, 1983, p. 496-507.
- Kelly, Christopher, A Theory of the Good, Boulder, University of Colorado, 2003.
- Kruska, D. C. T., “On the Evolutionary Significance of Encephalization in Some Eutherian Mammals: Effects of Adaptive Radiation, Domestication, and Feralization,” Brain, Behavior and Evolution, vol. 65, no. 2, 2005, p. 73-108.
- Leiserowitz, Anthony A., Robert W. Kates and Thomas M. Parris, “Do Global Attitudes and Behaviors Support Sustainable Development?,” Environment, vol. 47, no. 9, 2005, p. 22-38.
- Leonard, Annie, The Story of Stuff: How Our Obsessions with Stuff is Trashing the Planet, Our Communities, and Our Health—A Vision for Change, New York, Simon and Schuster, 2010.
- Leopold, Aldo, A Sand County Almanac, New York, Oxford University, 1949.
- Machovina, Brian, Kenneth J. Feeley and William J. Ripple, “Biodiversity Conservation: The Key Is Reducing Meat Consumption,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 536, 2015, p. 419-431.
- Mikkelson, Gregory M., “Weighing Species,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 33, no. 2, 2011, p. 185-196.
- Mikkelson, Gregory M., “Growth is the Problem; Equality is the Solution,” Sustainability, vol. 5, 2013, p. 432-439.
- Mikkelson, Gregory M., “Sentience, Life, Richness,” in Tyler DesRoches, Frank Jankunis and Byron Williston (eds.), Canadian Environmental Philosophy, in press.
- Mikkelson, Gregory M., “Invisible Hand or Ecological Footprint? Comparing Social vs. Environmental Impacts of Recent Economic Growth,” in review.
- Mikkelson, Gregory M. and Colin A. Chapman, “Individualistic Environmental Ethics: A Reductio ad Exstinctum?,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 36, no. 3, 2014, p. 333-338.
- Monbiot, George, Feral, Toronto, Penguin, 2013.
- Naess, Arne and George Sessions, The Deep Ecology Platform, www.deepecology.org/platform.htm, 1984.
- Norton, Bryan G., “Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism,” Environmental Ethics, vol. 6, no. 2, 1984, p. 131-148.
- Paine, Robert T., “Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity,” American Naturalist, vol. 100, no. 910, 1966, p. 65-75.
- Ripple, William J. and Robert L. Beschta, “Trophic Cascades in Yellowstone: The First 15 Years after Wolf Reintroduction,” Biological Conservation, vol. 145, no. 1, 2012, p. 205-213.
- Ryder, Richard (ed.), Animal Welfare and the Environment, London, Gerald Duckworth, 1992.
- Singer, Peter, “Animal Liberation,” The New York Review of Books, April 5, 1973.
- Singer, Peter, Foreword, in Ryder, Richard (ed.), Animal Welfare and the Environment, London, Gerald Duckworth, 1992.
- Singer, Peter, Practical Ethics, New York, Cambridge University, 2011.
- Terborgh, John W., “Toward a Trophic Theory of Species Diversity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 37, 2015, p. 11415-11422.
- Williston, Byron (ed.), Environmental Ethics for Canadians, Toronto, Oxford University, 2016.
- WWF, Living Planet Report 2016: Risk and Resilience in a New Era, Gland, WWF International, 2016.