Abstracts
Abstract
Happiness has become a central theme in public debates. Happiness indicators illustrate this importance. This article offers a typology of the main challenges conveyed by the elaboration of happiness indicators, where happiness can be understood as hedonia, subjective well-being, or eudaimonia. The typology is structured around four questions: (1) what to measure?—i.e., the difficulties linked to the choice of a particular understanding of happiness for building an indicator; (2) whom to include?—i.e., the limits of the community monitored by such an indicator; (3) how to collect the data?—i.e., the difficulties stemming from objective and subjective reporting; (4) what to do?—i.e., the concerns about the use of happiness indicators in public policy. The major points of normative contention are discussed for each of these dimensions. The purpose of this article is to contribute in a constructive manner to happiness research by offering an overview of some major philosophical and political challenges of building happiness indicators. The conclusion underlines the importance of the strategy of diversification- hybridization, which consists in setting a variety of indicators or composite indicators that articulate different understandings of happiness. It is stressed that happiness indicators raise democratic and institutional issues with which normative thinkers should deal.
Résumé
Le bonheur est devenu un thème central dans les débats publics. Les indicateurs de bonheur illustrent cette importance. Cet article offre une typologie des principaux enjeux contenus dans le travail d’élaboration d’indicateurs de bonheur quand ce dernier est compris comme hedonia, bien-être subjectif ou eudaimonia. La typologie est structurée autour de quatre questions : 1) que mesurer?, où sont en jeu les difficultés liées au choix d’une compréhension particulière du bonheur pour construire un indicateur; 2) qui inclure?, c’est-à-dire comment tracer les limites de la communauté morale qui est l’objet d’un tel indicateur; 3) comment collecter les données?, où on interroge les difficultés propres aux techniques subjectives et objectives de collecte de données; 4) que faire?, où on soulève l’enjeu des craintes quant à l’usage d’indicateurs de bonheur dans les politiques publiques. Les points majeurs de dispute normative sont discutés pour chaque dimension. Nous espérons ainsi contribuer de manière constructive à la recherche sur le bonheur en offrant un aperçu de quelques défis philosophiques et politiques majeurs relatifs à la construction d’indicateurs de bonheur. Nous concluons en soulignant l’importance de la stratégie de diversification-hybridation qui consiste à mettre en place des indicateurs variés ou composites articulant différentes compréhensions du bonheur. Ces indicateurs soulèvent des enjeux démocratiques et institutionnels que les penseurs normatifs doivent considérer.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Alexandrova, Anna, “Subjective Well-Being and Kahneman’s Objective Happiness,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, 2005, pp. 301-324.
- Annas, Julia, The Morality of Happiness, New York, Oxford University Press, 1993.
- Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics.
- Baumeister, Roy F., Kathleen D. Vohs, Jennifer L. Aaker and Emily N. Garbinsky, “Some Key Differences between a Happy Life and a Meaningful Life,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 8, no. 6, 2013, pp. 505-516.
- Biswas-Diener, Robert, Todd B. Kashdan and Laura A. King, “Two Traditions of Happiness Research, Not Two Distinct Types of Happiness,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, 2009, pp. 208-211.
- Bok, Derek C., The Politics of Happiness, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2010.
- Brickman, Philip, Dan Coates and Ronnie Janoff-Bulman, “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 36, no. 8, 1978, pp. 917-927.
- Brülde, Bengt, “Happiness, Morality, and Politics,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 11, no. 5, 2010, pp. 567-583.
- Clark, Andrew E., Paul Frijters and Michael A. Shields, “Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 46, no. 1, 2008, pp. 95-144.
- Crisp, Roger, “Editor’s Introduction,” in Roger Crisp (ed.), J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 5-35.
- Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, New York, HarperCollins, 1990.
- De Prycker, Valérie, “Happiness on the Political Agenda? PROS and CONS,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 11, no. 5, 2010, pp. 585-603.
- Deci, Edward L. and Richard M. Ryan, “Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and Well-Being: An Introduction,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008, p. 1-11.
- Diener, Ed, “Subjective Well-Being,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 95, no. 3, 1984, pp. 542-575.
- Diener, Ed, “Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities,” Social Indicators Research, vol. 31, no. 2, 1994, pp. 103-157.
- Diener, Ed, “Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index,” American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, 2000, pp. 34-43.
- Diener, Ed (ed.), Culture and Well-Being, New York, Springer, 2009.
- Diener, Ed and Martin E. P. Seligman, “Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being,” Psychology Science in the Public Interest, vol. 5, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1-31.
- Diener, Ed, Eunkook M. Suh, Richard E. Lucas and Heidi L. Smith, “Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 125, no. 2, 1999, pp. 276-302.
- Duncan, Grant, “Should Happiness-Maximization Be the Goal of Government?,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, 2010, pp. 163-178.
- Durand, Martine and Conal Smith, “The OECD Approach to Measuring Well-Being,” in John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs (eds.), World Happiness Report 2013, New York, The Earth Institute, 2013.
- Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle, New York, Oxford University Press, 1985.
- Easterlin, Richard A., “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence,” in Paul A. David and M. W. Reder (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, New York, Academic Press, 1974, pp. 89-125.
- Easterlin, Richard A., “Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 27, no. 1, 1995, pp. 35-48.
- Easterlin, Richard A., “Explaining Happiness,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 100, no. 9, 2003, pp. 1176-1183.
- Easterlin, Richard A., Laura Angelescu McVey, Malgorzata Switek, Onnicha Sawangfa and Jacqueline Smith Zweig, “The Happiness–Income Paradox Revisited,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no. 52, 2010, pp. 22463-22468.
- Frank, Robert H., Passions within Reason: The Strategic Value of the Emotion, New York, Norton, 1988.
- Frey, Bruno S., Happiness: A Revolution in Economics, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2008.
- Frey, Bruno S. and Jana Gallus, “Happiness Policy and Economic Development,” International Journal of Happiness and Development, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, pp. 102-111.
- Frey, Bruno S. and Jana Gallus, “Political Economy of Happiness,” Applied Economics, vol. 45, no. 30, 2013, pp. 4205-4211.
- Gilbert, Daniel T., Stumbling on Happiness, New York, Knopf, 2006.
- Gilbert, Daniel T. and Thomas D. Wilson, “Miswanting: Some Problems in the Forecasting of Future Affective States,” in Joseph Paul Forgas (ed.), Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 178-197.
- Graham, Carol, Happiness around the World: The Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires, New York, Oxford University Press, 2009.
- Haybron, Daniel M., The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being, New York, Oxford University Press, 2010.
- Haybron, Daniel M., Happiness, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
- Helliwell, John, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs (eds.), World Happiness Report2013, New York, The Earth Institute - Columbia University, 2013.
- Helliwell, John, Richard Layard, and Jeffrey Sachs (eds.), World Happiness Report 2015, New York, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2015.
- Helliwell, John F. and Christopher P. Barrington-Leigh, “View Point: Measuring and Understanding Subjective Well-Being,” Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 43, no. 3, 2010, pp. 729-753.
- Jany-Catrice, Florence, “Quand mesurer devient maladif,” Revue Projet, no. 331, 2012, pp. 6-13.
- Kahneman, Daniel, “Objective Happiness,” in Daniel Kahneman, Ed Diener and Norbert Schwarz (eds.), Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1999, pp. 3-25.
- Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York, Penguin, 2011.
- Kahneman, Daniel and Alan B. Krueger, “Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 1, 2006, pp. 3-24.
- Kahneman, Daniel, Alan B. Krueger, David Schkade, Norbert Schwarz and Arthur Stone, “Toward National Well-Being Accounts,” The American Economic Review, vol. 94, no. 2, 2004a, pp. 429-434.
- Kahneman, Daniel, Alan B. Krueger, David Schkade, Norbert Schwarz and Arthur Stone, “A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5702, pp. 1776-1780.
- Kahneman, Daniel, Peter P. Wakker and Rakesh Sarin, “Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112, no. 2, 1997, pp. 375-405.
- Kashdan, Todd B., Robert Biswas-Diener and Laura A. King, “Reconsidering Happiness: The Costs of Distinguishing Between Hedonics and Eudaimonia,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 3, no. 4, 2008, pp. 219-233.
- Keyes, Corey L. M. and Julia Annas, “Feeling Good and Functioning Well: Distinctive Concepts in Ancient Philosophy and Contemporary Science,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 4, no. 3, 2009, pp. 197-201.
- Kraut, Richard, “Two Conceptions of Happiness,” Philosophical Review, vol. 88, no. 2, 1979, pp. 167-197.
- Kroll, Christian and Jan Dehley, “A Happy Nation? Opportunities and Challenges of Using Subjective Indicators in Policymaking,” Social Indicators Research, vol. 114, no. 1, 2013, pp. 13-28.
- Krueger, Alan B. (ed.), Measuring the Subjective Well-Being of Nations: National Accounts of Time Use and Well-Being, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2009.
- Landes, Xavier, “Happiness and Politics,” Ethics and Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, 2013, pp. 1-30.
- Layard, Richard, Happiness: Lessons From a New Science, London, Penguin Books, 2005.
- Nussbaum, Martha, “Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism,” Political Theory, vol. 20, no. 2, 1992, pp. 202-246.
- Nussbaum, Martha, “Mill between Aristotle and Bentham,” in Luigino Bruni and Pier Luigi Porta (eds.), Economics and Happiness: Framing the Analysis, New York, Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 170-183.
- Nussbaum, Martha, “Who Is the Happy Warrior? Philosophy Poses Questions to Psychology,” in Eric A. Posner and Cass R. Sunstein (eds.), Law and Happiness, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 2010, pp. 81-113.
- Pavot, William, “The Assessment of Subjective Well-Being: Successes and Shortfalls,” in Michael Eid and Randy Larsen (eds.), The Science of Subjective Well-being, New York, The Guilford Press, 2008, pp. 124-140.
- Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Belknap Press, 1971.
- Ryan, Richard M. and Edward L. Deci, “On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-being,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 52, no. 1, 2001, pp. 141-166.
- Ryan, Richard M., Veronika Huta and Edward L. Deci, “Living Well: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Eudaimonia,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008, pp. 139-170.
- Ryff, Carol D. and Corey L. M. Keyes, “The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 69, no. 4, 1995, pp. 719-727.
- Saamah, Abdallah, Juliet Michaelson, Sagar Shah, Laura Stoll and Nic Marks, The Happy Planet Index: 2012 Report, London, The New Economics Foundation, 2012.
- Sachs, Jeffrey, “Introduction,” in John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs (eds.), World Happiness Report 2012, New York, The Earth Institute, 2012, pp. 2-9.
- Seligman, Martin E. P., Authentic Happiness: Using The New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential For Lasting Fulfillment, New York, Free Press, 2012.
- Sen, Amartya, Commodities and Capabilities, New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1999.
- Sharpe, Andrew, A Survey of Indicators of Economic and Social Well-being, Ottawa, Canadian Policy Research Network, 1999, p. 73.
- Stevenson, Betsey and Justin Wolfers, Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 2008.
- Stiglitz, Joseph E., Amartya Sen and Fitoussi, Jean-Paul, Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris, Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, 2009.
- Sumner, L. W., Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, New York, Oxford University Press, 1996.
- Tiberius, Valerie, “Well-Being: Psychological Research for Philosophers,” Philosophical Compass, vol. 1, no. 5, 2006, pp. 493-505.
- Vazquez, Carmelo and Gonzalo Hervas, “Addressing Current Challenges in Cross-Cultural Measurement of Well-Being: The Pemberton Happiness Index,” in Hans Henrik Knoop and Antonella Delle Fave (eds.), Well-Being and Cultures: Perspectives from Positive Psychology, New York, Springer, 2013.
- Veenhoven, Ruut, “Why Social Policy Needs Subjective Indicators,” Social indicators research, vol. 58, 2002, pp. 33-45.
- Waterman, Alan S., “Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 64, no. 4, 1993, pp. 678-691.
- Waterman, Alan S., “Reconsidering Happiness: A Eudaimonist’s Perspective,” The Journal of Positive Psychology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 234-252.