Engagement des étudiants : une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle appliquée à des modalités de cours hybrides universitaires

Heilporn, Géraldine; Lakhal, Sawsen; Bélisle, Marilou; St-Onge, Christina

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1081043ar

Alvarez-Bell, R. M., Wirtz, D. et Bian, H. (2017). Identifying keys to success in innovative teaching: Student engagement and instructional practices as predictors of student learning in a course using a team-based learning approach. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 128‑146. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/TLI/article/view/57489/43250

Google Scholar 10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.2.10

American Educational Research Association (AERA). (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. AERA.

Google Scholar

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D. et Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427‑445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002

Berry, S. (2019). Teaching to connect: Community-building strategies for the virtual classroom. Online Learning, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1425

Google Scholar 10.24059/olj.v23i1.1425

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R. et Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Google Scholar 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Boelens, R., De Wever, B. et Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22(Supplément C), 1‑18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001

Boelens, R., Voet, M. et De Wever, B. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers & Education, 120, 197‑212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009

Bond, M. et Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528

Google Scholar 10.5334/jime.528

Bonk, C. J. et Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.

Google Scholar

Bourque, J., Poulin, N. et Cleaver, A. F. (2007). Évaluation de l’utilisation et de la présentation des résultats d’analyses factorielles et d’analyses en composantes principales en éducation. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 32(2), 325‑344. https://doi.org/10.7202/014411ar

Google Scholar Icône pour les DOIs Érudit

10.7202/014411ar

Brault-Labbé, A. et Dubé, L. (2010). Engagement scolaire, bien-être personnel et autodétermination chez des étudiants à l’université. Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 42(2), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017385

Google Scholar 10.1037/a0017385

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. et Wylie, C. (dir.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.

Google Scholar 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

Clark, L. A. et Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309

Google Scholar 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309

Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121‑141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878

Google Scholar 10.1080/02602930600801878

Conseil supérieur de l’éducation. (2015). Formation à distance dans les universités québécoises : un potentiel à optimiser. Gouvernement du Québec. https://www.cse.gouv.qc.ca/publications/formation-distance-universites-50-0486

Google Scholar

Conseil supérieur de l’éducation. (2020). Éduquer au numérique. Gouvernement du Québec. https://www.cse.gouv.qc.ca/publications/eduquer-au-numerique-50-0534

Google Scholar

Costello, A. B. et Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Exploratory Factor Analysis, 10(7), 1‑9. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1156&context=pare

Google Scholar

DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4e éd.). SAGE Publications.

Google Scholar

Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1‑13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890707.pdf

Google Scholar

Donovan, D. T. (2019). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2018. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association.

Google Scholar

Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J. et Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90‑100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003

Dumford, A. D. et Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452‑465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z

Google Scholar 10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z

Fadde, P. J. et Vu, P. (2014). Blended online learning: Benefits, challenges, and misconceptions. Dans P. R. Lowenthal, C. S. York et J. C. Richardson (dir.), Online learning: Common misconceptions, benefits and challenges (p. 33-48). Nova Science Publishing.

Google Scholar

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C. et Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59‑109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Google Scholar 10.3102/00346543074001059

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M. et Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L. et Christenson, S. L. (2019). Conclusion: Status of student engagement interventions. Dans J. A. Fredricks, A. L. Reschly et S. L. Christenson (dir.), Handbook of student engagement interventions (p. 375‑389). Elsevier.

Google Scholar 10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00025-5

Garrison, D. R. et Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

Google Scholar 10.1002/9781118269558

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. Dans M. G. Moore (dir.), Handbook of distance education (3e éd., p. 333‑350). Routledge.

Google Scholar 10.4324/9780203803738.ch21

Halverson, L. R. et Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481

Google Scholar 10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481

Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S. et Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20‑34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N. et Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192

Google Scholar 10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192

Heilporn, G. (2021). Stratégies favorisant l’engagement des étudiants dans des modalités de cours hybrides en enseignement supérieur [thèse de doctorat, Université de Sherbrooke]. Savoirs UdeS. https://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/handle/11143/18359

Google Scholar

Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S. et Bélisle, M. (2021a). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3

Google Scholar 10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3

Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S. et Bélisle, M. (2021b). Relationships, relevance and sustained pace are key to foster student engagement in blended online courses [document soumis pour publication]. Département de pédagogie, Faculté d’éducation, Université de Sherbrooke.

Google Scholar

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R. et Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36‑53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

Hoi, V. N. et Le Hang, H. (2021). The structure of student engagement in online learning: A bi-factor exploratory structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12551

Google Scholar

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63, 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Google Scholar 10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758‑773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Google Scholar 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Krause, K. et Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493‑505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698892

Google Scholar 10.1080/02602930701698892

Lakhal, S., Bateman, D. et Bédard, J. (2017). Blended synchronous delivery mode in graduate programs: A literature review and its implementation in the master teacher program. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 47‑60. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1147188.pdf

Google Scholar 10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747

Lakhal, S. et Meyer, F. (2019). Blended learning. Dans A. Tatnall (dir.), Encyclopedia of education and information technologies (p. 1-9). Springer.

Google Scholar 10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_41-1

Lakhal, S., Mukamurera, J., Bédard, M.-È., Heilporn, G. et Chauret, M. (2020). Features fostering academic and social integration in blended synchronous courses in graduate programs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0180-z

Google Scholar 10.1186/s41239-020-0180-z

Laveault, D. et Grégoire, J. (2014). Introduction aux théories de tests en psychologie et en sciences de l’éducation. De Boeck Supérieur.

Google Scholar

Lawson, M. A. et Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432-479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891

Google Scholar 10.3102/0034654313480891

Maccallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., Hong, S., Maccallum, R. C., Zhang, S. et Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.536.6317&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Google Scholar 10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Assessment of student engagement in higher education: A synthesis of literature and assessment tools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 12(2), 1‑14. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/367

Google Scholar

Manwaring, K. C., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R. et Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 35(Supplément C), 21‑33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002

Google Scholar 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002

Maroco, J., Maroco, A. L., Campos, J. A. D. B. et Fredricks, J. A. (2016). University student’s engagement: Development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(1), 1‑12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0042-8

Google Scholar 10.1186/s41155-016-0042-8

Martin, F. et Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Google Scholar 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Mayer, D. (2019). Comparaison entre les étudiants de première et de seconde génération : engagement, rendement et persévérance. Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 14(2), 303-333. https://doi.org/10.7202/1062513ar

Google Scholar Icône pour les DOIs Érudit

10.7202/1062513ar

Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741

Google Scholar 10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741

Ouimet, J. A. et Smallwood, R. A. (2005). Assessment measures: CLASSE – The Class-Level Survey of Student Engagement. Assessment Update, 17(6), 13‑15.

Google Scholar

Parent, S. (2017). Perception des étudiants et des enseignants quant à l’aspect novateur du numérique dans un cours d’introduction au collégial. Revue canadienne des jeunes chercheur(e)s en éducation, 8(2), 30-39. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjnse/article/view/42917

Google Scholar

Pituch, K. A. et Stevens, J. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS (6th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Google Scholar

Power, M. (2008). The emergence of a blended online learning environment. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 503‑514.

Google Scholar

Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I. et Depaepe, F. (2019). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23, 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z

Google Scholar 10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z

Redmond, P., Abawi, L. A., Brown, A., Henderson, R. et Heffernan, A. (2018). An online engagement framework for higher education. Online Learning, 22(1), 183-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175

Google Scholar 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175

Schreiner, L. A. et Louis, M. (2011). The engaged learning index: Implications for faculty development. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(1), 5‑28.

Google Scholar

Spring, K. J., Graham, C. R. et Hadlock, C. A. (2016). The current landscape of international blended learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 84‑102. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.075961

Google Scholar 10.1504/IJTEL.2016.075961

Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R. et Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar

Sturgis, P., Roberts, C. et Smith, P. (2014). Middle alternatives revisited: How the neither/nor response acts as a way of saying “I don’t know”? Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 15‑38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112452527

Google Scholar 10.1177/0049124112452527

Tabachnick, B. G. et Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.

Google Scholar

Taylor, M., Vaughan, N., Ghani, S. K., Atas, S. et Fairbrother, M. (2018). Looking back and looking forward: A glimpse of blended learning in higher education from 2007-2017. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 9(1), 1‑14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAVET.2018010101

Google Scholar 10.4018/IJAVET.2018010101

Vaughan, N. (2014). Student engagement and blended learning: Making the assessment connection. Education Sciences, 4(4), 247‑264. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4040247

Google Scholar 10.3390/educsci4040247

Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23‑32. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f83c30d3f7e7d1cd69754d1fa52eaff5/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=29705

Google Scholar

Worthington, R. L. et Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806‑838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127

Google Scholar 10.1177/0011000006288127

Yong, A. G. et Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79‑94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

Google Scholar 10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

Zhoc, K. C., Webster, B. J., King, R. B., Li, J. C. et Chung, T. S. (2019). Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES): Development and psychometric evidence. Research in Higher Education, 60(2), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6

Google Scholar 10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6

Engagement des étudiants : une échelle de mesure multidimensionnelle appliquée à des modalités de cours hybrides universitaires[Notice]

Note des auteures

Résumé

Abstract

Resumo

Références

Résumés

Résumé

Abstract

Resumo

Parties annexes

Références

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article