Résumés
Abstract
Curricular alignment refers to the links of coherence, found in any teaching-learning process, between curriculum objectives, learning tasks and assessment approaches. This model makes it possible to understand the coherence of any assessment approach. By mobilizing data from a collaborative study carried out on eight secondary school teachers of mathematics and French, we will show, however, that its meaning is rather limited when it comes to understanding coherence in graded summative assessment practices and that, consequently, the model needs to be expanded conceptually. To this end, we will draw on an example of a summative test modelled in this way. Our findings demonstrate the relevance of analyzing summative assessment practices with the help of the expanded model, while considering the role that context plays in certain of its aspects.
Keywords:
- summative assessment,
- curricular alignment,
- assessment practices,
- grading
Résumé
L’alignement curriculaire désigne les liens de cohérence existant dans tout processus d’enseignement-apprentissage entre les objectifs du curriculum, les tâches d’apprentissage et les démarches d’évaluation. Ce modèle permet notamment de comprendre la cohérence de toute démarche évaluative. En mobilisant des données issues d’une recherche collaborative menée avec huit enseignants de mathématiques et de français du secondaire, nous montrerons toutefois que son acception est limitée lorsqu’il s’agit de comprendre cette cohérence saisie dans des pratiques évaluatives sommatives notées et que, dès lors, le modèle demande à être conceptuellement élargi. Pour cela, nous nous appuierons sur un exemple d’épreuve sommative modélisée dans ce sens. Nos résultats soulignent la pertinence d’analyser les pratiques évaluatives sommatives à l’aide du modèle élargi, tout en considérant le rôle que joue le contexte sur certaines de ses dimensions spécifiques.
Mots-clés :
- évaluation sommative,
- alignement curriculaire,
- pratiques évaluatives,
- notation
Resumo
O alinhamento curricular designa os vínculos de coerência existentes em qualquer processo de ensino-aprendizagem entre objetivos curriculares, tarefas de aprendizagem e as abordagens de avaliação. Este modelo permite nomeadamente compreender a coerência de qualquer processo avaliativo. Ao mobilizar dados de uma investigação colaborativa realizada com oito professores de matemática e de francês do ensino secundário, mostraremos, porém, que o seu significado é limitado quando se trata de compreender essa coerência identificada nas práticas avaliativas sumativas e que, portanto, o modelo precisa ser concetualmente ampliado. Neste sentido, apoiar-nos-emos num exemplo de um teste sumativo concebido em função destes pressupostos. Os nossos resultados destacam a pertinência de analisar práticas avaliativas sumativas usando o modelo alargado, considerando o papel que o contexto desempenha em algumas de suas dimensões específicas.
Palavras chaves:
- avaliação sumativa,
- alinhamento curricular,
- práticas avaliativas,
- notação
Parties annexes
Références
- Airasian, W. & Miranda, H. (2002). The role of assessment in the revised taxonomy. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 249-254. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_8
- Allal, L. & Mottier Lopez, L. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. In Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 241-264; French version available). Paris: OECD-CERI.
- Anadon, M. & Guillemette, F. (2007). La recherche qualitative est-elle nécessairement inductive ? Recherches qualitatives, 5, 26-37. Retrieved from www.recherche-qualitative.qc.ca/documents/files/revue/hors_serie/hors_serie_v5/anadon.pdf
- Anderson, L. W. (2002). Curricular alignment: A re-examination. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 255-260. Retrieved from http://iowaascd.org/files/5313/4045/2315/BloomAI.pdf
- Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
- Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27-31. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31
- Antibi, A. (2003). La constante macabre ou comment a-t-on découragé des générations d’élèves. Toulouse: Math’Adore.
- Balach, C. A. & Szymanski, G. J. (2003, April). The growth of a professional learning community through collaborative action research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED477527.pdf
- Bateman, D., Taylor, S., Janik, E. & Logan, A. (2009). Curriculum coherence and student success. Pédagogie collégiale, 22(5), 8-18. Retrieved from http://aqpc.qc.ca/sites/default/files/revue/bateman.pdf
- Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75. doi: 10.1080/0729436990180105
- Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching for constructive learning. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/id477_aligning_teaching_for_constructing_learning.pdf
- Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. New York: McGraw Hill.
- Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 1, 7-74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
- Bonner, S. M. (2013). Validity in classroom assessment: Purposes, properties, and principles. In J. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 87-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Braxmeyer, N., Guillaume, J.-C. & Levy, J.-F. (2004). Les pratiques d’évaluation des enseignants au collège. Les dossiers du ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, Direction de l’évaluation et de la prospective, 160, 5-117.
- Brookhart, S. M. (2005). Assessment theory for college classrooms. New directions for teaching and learning, 100, 5-14. doi: 10.1002/tl.165
- Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to use grading to improve learning. North Garden, VA: Virginia ASCD.
- Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. London: Routledge.
- Conseil national d’évaluation du système scolaire (CNESCO). (2014). L’évaluation des élèves par les enseignants dans la classe et les établissements : réglementation et pratiques. Une comparaison internationale dans les pays de l’OCDE. Paris: CNESCO.
- Crahay, M. (2007). Peut-on lutter contre l’échec scolaire ? Brussels: De Boeck.
- Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
- Desgagné, S. (1997). Le concept de recherche collaborative : l’idée d’un rapprochement entre chercheurs universitaires et praticiens enseignants. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 23(2), 371-393. doi: 10.7202/031921ar
- Desgagné, S. (2005). Récits exemplaires de pratique enseignante : analyse typologique. Sainte-Foy, QC: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Desgagné, S., Bednarz, N., Lebuis, P., Poirier, L. & Couture, C. (2001). L’approche collaborative de recherche en éducation : un rapport nouveau à établir entre recherche et formation. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 27(1), 33-64. doi: 10.7202/000305ar
- Gagné, P., Dumont, L., Brunet, S., & Boucher, G. (2013). Curriculum alignment: Establishing coherence. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, VI, 7-12. doi: 10.22329/celt.v6i0.3763
- Gauthier, C., Mellouki, M., Bissonnette, S. & Richard, M. (2005). Écoles efficaces et réussite scolaire des élèves à risque : un état de la recherche (Research report). Québec, QC: CRIFPE.
- Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 7-11. Retrieved from www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb03/vol60/num05/How-Classroom-Assessments-Improve-Learning.aspx
- Guskey, T. R. (2006). Making high school grades meaningful. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(9), 670-675. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/620a/83c1e1911e49f2647bc6ec98ee5d46027e47.pdf
- Guskey, T. R. (2011). Five obstacles to grading reform. Effective Grading Practices, 69(3), 16-21. Retrieved from www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov11/vol69/num03/Five-Obstacles-to-Grading-Reform.aspx
- Hadji, C. (2016). Le système éducatif peut-il passer de l’évaluation normative à une évaluation constructive ? In B. Boquet (Ed.). La fièvre de l’évaluation : quels symptômes, quels traitements ? (pp. 113-135). Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
- Hadji, C. (2017). Savoir mettre en oeuvre une évaluation constructive. In A. Bentolila (Ed.). L’essentiel de la pédagogie. (pp. 229-250). Paris: Nathan.
- Hammerness, K. C. (2006). From coherence in theory to coherence in practice. Teachers College Record, 108(7), 1241-1265. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00692.x
- Harlen, W. (2005). Teacher’s summative practices and assessment for learning: Tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207-223. doi: 10.1080/09585170500136093
- Harlen, W. (2012). On the relationship between assessment or formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 87-102). London: SAGE.
- Jonsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 840-852. doi: 10.1080/09585170500136093
- Martone, A. & Sireci, S. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1332-1361. doi: 10.3102/0034654309341375
- Marzano, R. J. (2002). A comparison of selected methods of scoring classroom assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 249-267. doi: 10.1207/S15324818AME1503_2
- Marzano, R. J. & Heflebower, T. (2011). Grades that show what students know. Effective Grading Practices, 69(3), 34-39. Retrieved from www.math.arizona.edu/~vbohme/Grades%20That%20Show%20What%20Students%20Know.pdf
- McGrath, H. & Noble, T. (2008). Huit façons d’enseigner, d’apprendre et d’évaluer. Montréal, QC: Chenelière Éducation.
- McKinney, S. E., Chappell, S., Berry, R. Q., & Hickmann, B. T. (2009). An examination of the instructional practices of mathematics teachers in urban schools. Preventing school failure: Alternative education for children and youth, 53(4), 278-284. doi: 10.3200/ PSFL.53.4.278-284
- McMillan, J. H. & Nash, S. (2000, April). Teacher classroom assessment and grading practices decision making. Paper presented at the NCME Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED447195.pdf
- Meier, S. L., Rich, B. S., & Cady, J. (2006). Teacher’s use of rubrics to score non-traditional tasks: Factors related to discrepancies in scoring. Assessment in Education, 13(1), 69-95. doi: 10.1080/09695940600563512
- Moss, C. (2013). Research on classroom summative assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 235-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Mottier Lopez, L. (2015). Evaluations formative et certificative des apprentissages. Brussels: De Boeck.
- Mottier Lopez, L. & Laveault, D. (2008). L’évaluation des apprentissages en contexte scolaire : développements, enjeux et controverses. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 31(3), 5-34. doi: 10.7202/1024962ar
- Mottier Lopez, L. & Pasquini, R. (2017). Professionnal controversies between teachers about their sommative assessment practices: A tool for building assessment capacity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 228-249. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2017.1293001
- Mottier Lopez, L., Tessaro, W., Dechamboux, L. & Morales Villabona, F. (2012). La modération sociale : un dispositif soutenant l’émergence de savoirs négociés sur l’évaluation certificative des apprentissages des élèves. Questions vives, 18, 159-175. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/questionsvives/1235
- Paillé, P. & Muchielli, A. (2012). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales.Paris: Armand Colin.
- Pasquini, R. (2013). Quand les récits de pratique enseignante parlent d’apprentissage.Québec, QC: Presses de l’Université Laval.
- Pasquini, R. (2016). Et si, pour mieux saisir la complexité de la pratique, nous passions par l’écriture ? Didactiques en pratique, 2, 21-29. Retrieved from https://orfee.hepl.ch/handle/20.500.12162/2423
- Pasquini, R. (2017). Évaluation : première question vive de la pratique. L’Éducateur, 4, 38-39. Retrieved from https://orfee.hepl.ch/handle/20.500.12162/1604
- Pasquini, R. (2018). Le modèle théorique de l’alignement curriculaire élargi pour étudier des pratiques évaluatives sommatives d’enseignants de mathématiques et de français du secondaire : enjeux conceptuels et pragmatiques (Unpuplished doctoral thesis). University of Geneva, Geneva. Retrieved from https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:106442
- Randall, J. & Engelhard, G. (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1372-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008
- Rieg, S. A. (2007). Classroom assessment strategies: What do students at-risk and teachers perceive as effective and useful? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 34(4), 214-225.
- Sadler, R. D. (2009). Transforming holistic assessment and grading into a vehicle for complex learning. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 1-15). London: Springer.
- Sayac, N. (2017). Étude des pratiques évaluatives en mathématiques de 25 professeurs des écoles français : une approche didactique à partir de l’analyse des tâches données en évaluation. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 40(2), 1-31. doi: 10.7202/1043566ar
- Silverman, D. (2009). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Timperley, H. S. & Parr, J. M. (2009). Chain of influence from policy to practice in the New Zealand literacy strategy. Research Papers in Education, 24(2), 135-154. doi: 10.1080/02671520902867077
- Van Nieuwenhoven, C. & Colognesi, S. (2015). Une recherche collaborative sur l’accompagnement des futurs instituteurs: un levier de développement professionnel pour les maîtres de stage. Évaluer: Journal international de recherche en éducation et formation, 1(2), 103-121. Retrieved from http://usherbrooke.crifpe.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/vnh-colo-jiref_2015.pdf
- Vial, M. (2012). Se repérer dans les modèles de l’évaluation. Brussels: De Boeck.
- Walvoord, B. E. & Johnson Anderson, V. (2009). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
- Wigging, G. & McTighe, J. M. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Winger, T. (2009). Grading what matters. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 73.
- Winger, T. (2009). Grading what matters. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 73.
10.7202/031921ar