Résumés
Abstract
This paper summarizes various interpretations of emotional arguments, with a focus on the emotional mode of argument introduced in the multi-modal argumentation model (Gilbert, 1994). From there the author shifts from a descriptive account of emotional arguments to a discussion about a normative framework. Pointing out problems with evaluative models of the emotional mode, a paradigmatic shift captured by the Amenable Argumentation Approach is explained as a way forward for the advancement of the emotional mode and multi-modal argumentation.
Keywords:
- amenable argumentation approach,
- argument1,
- argument2,
- argumentative multilingualism,
- conceptual framework,
- critical-logical model,
- emotional mode,
- multi-modal argumentation
Résumé
Cet article résume diverses interprétations des arguments émotionnels, en mettant l'accent sur le mode d'argument émotionnel introduit dans le modèle d'argumentation multimodal (Gilbert, 1994). De là, l'auteur passe d'un récit descriptif d'arguments émotionnels à une discussion sur un cadre normatif. Soulignant les problèmes des modèles évaluatifs du mode émotionnel, l'auteur décrit un changement de paradigme capturé par l'approche d'argumentation comme une voie à suivre pour l'avancement du mode émotionnel et de l'argumentation multimodale.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ben-Ze’ev, A. 1995. Emotions and argumentation. Informal Logic 17(2): 189-200. <https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v17i2.2407>
- Ben-Ze’ev, A. 1996. Typical emotions. In Psychology and Philosophy, ed. O. D. Kitchener. London: Sage.
- Brockriede, W. 1975. Where is argument? The Journal of the American Forensic Association 11(4): 179-182. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1975.11951059>
- Carlson, J. G. and Hatfield, E. 1992. Psychology of emotion. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
- Carozza, L. 2007. Dissent in the midst of emotional territory. Informal Logic 27(2): 197-210. <https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v27i2.475>
- Carozza, L. 2009. The emotional mode of argumentation: Descriptive, people-centered, and process-oriented. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, York University, Toronto ON, Canada.
- Carozza, L. 2011. The evaluation of emotional arguments: a test run. Argumentation: Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. Frank Zenker. Windsor, Ontario.
- Cohen, D. 2013. For argument’s sake [Video]. TEDxColbyCollege. https://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_h_cohen_for_argument_s_sake?language=en
- Gearhart, S. M. 1979. The womanization of rhetoric. Women's Studies International Quarterly 2(2): 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(79)91809-8
- Gilbert, M. A. 1994. Multi-modal argumentation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24(2): 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319402400202
- Gilbert, M. A. 1997a. Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Gilbert, M. A. 1997b. Prolegomenon to a pragmatics of emotion. Paper presented at the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference: Argumentation and Rhetoric, Brock University, St. Catherines.
- Gilbert, M. A. 2001. Emotional messages. Argumentation 15(3): 239-250.
- Gilbert, M. A. 2004. Emotion, argumentation and informal logic. Informal Logic 24(3): 245-264. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v24i3.2147
- Gilbert, M. A. 2019. Multi-Modal 2010: Multi-modal argumentation 20 years later. Informal Logic: A 'Canadian' approach to argument, ed. Federico Puppo. 313-331. Windsor, Ontario.
- Goodwin, J. 2007. Argument has no function. Informal Logic 27(1): 69-90. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v27i1.465
- Gross, J. G. 2008. Emotion regulation. In Handbook of emotions, eds. Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M, Sloan, D. M., and Fresco, D. M. (3rd ed.). 497-512.
- Hample, D. and Irions, A.L. 2015. Arguing to display identity. Argumentation, 29: 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9351-9
- Jackson, S. 2019. Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi 38: 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9553-5
- Jacobs, S., and Aakhus, M. 2002. What mediators do with words: Implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20(2): 177-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.19
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Myers, D. G. 2004. Theories of emotion. In Psychology. (7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
- O'Keefe, D. J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. The Journal of the American Forensic Association 13(3): 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1977.11951098
- Plantin, C. 1999. Arguing emotions. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam.
- Walton, D. 1992. The place of emotion in argument. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Walton, D. N. 1998. The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
- Warren, K. J. 1988. Critical thinking and feminism. Informal logic, 10(1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v10i1.2636
- Warren, K. J. 1994. Ecological feminism. London: Routledge.
- Willard, C. A. 1978. A reformulation of the concept of argument: The constructivist/interactionist foundations of a sociology of argument. The Journal of the American Forensic Association 14(3): 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1978.11951121