Résumés
Abstract
Background: Aspiring medical students behave based on their perception of what is valued in the selection process. While research experience is not explicitly considered in most Canadian admissions policies, it is commonly held as valuable within aspiring medical student communities. The purpose of this study is to describe the perceptions and behaviours of aspiring medical students with respect to gaining research experience in support of their medical school applications.
Methods: We surveyed prospective applicants of Canadian medical schools between August 2021 and November 2021, then compiled descriptive statistics pertaining to their perceptions and behaviours.
Results: Respondents affirmed the belief that research experience is valued in medical school admissions processes. They reported spending approximately 13 hours per week engaged in research, which usually did not yield publication or presentation recognition.
Conclusion: Aspiring medical students invest substantial time and energy in research experiences to benefit their applications. There is room for medical schools to be more transparent about the value of research experience in their admissions processes.
Résumé
Contexte : Le comportement des candidats aux études de médecine est déterminé par leur perception de ce qui est valorisé dans le processus de sélection. Tandis que la plupart des établissements canadiens ne mentionnent pas explicitement l’expérience en recherche comme prérequis d’admission, les futurs candidats, eux, voient une telle expérience comme un atout précieux. L’objectif de cette étude est de décrire les perceptions et les comportements des futurs étudiants en médecine par rapport à l’acquisition d’une expérience en recherche en appui à leur demande d’admission dans une école de médecine.
Méthodes : Nous avons interrogé des postulants potentiels aux programmes de médecine au Canada entre août 2021 et novembre 2021, et nous avons compilé des statistiques descriptives relatives à leurs perceptions et à leurs comportements.
Résultats : Les répondants ont affirmé croire que l’expérience en recherche est valorisée dans les processus d’admission aux facultés de médecine. Ils ont déclaré consacrer environ 13 heures par semaine à la recherche, qui, le plus souvent, n’a pas mené à des publications ou des présentations.
Conclusion : Les futurs candidats aux études de médecine investissent beaucoup de temps et d’énergie dans des activités de recherche afin d’améliorer leur dossier de candidature. Les facultés de médecine devraient se prononcer de manière transparente sur l’importance attribuée à l’expérience en recherche dans le cadre de leur processus d’admission.
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- AFMC. Admission requirements of Canadian Faculties of Medicine for admission in 2023. Ottawa, ON.
- Yang L, Chang I, Ritz S, et al. Research experiences for Canadian aspiring physicians: a descriptive analysis of medical school admission policies concerning research involvement in Canada. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22: https://doi.org/1–10.10.1186/s12909-022-03207-y.
- MedApplications. 5 tips to find a research position as a pre-med college student. 2020. Available at https://medapplications.com/5-tips-find-research-position-pre-med-college-student/ [Accessed on Apr 25, 2021].
- Kowarski I. What type of research impresses med schools? US News & World Report. 2019. www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/top-medical-schools/articles/2019-05-30/what-type-of-research-helps-you-get-into-medical-school [Accessed on Apr 25, 2021].
- Princeton Review. 6 ways for pre-meds to gain research experience. 2021. Available at https://www.princetonreview.com/med-school-advice/research-experience-for-medical-school [Accessed on Apr 25, 2021].
- Lin KY, Anspach RR, Crawford B, et al. What must I do to succeed?: Narratives from the US premedical experience. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 119: 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.017.
- White J, Brownell K, Lemay J-F, et al. ‘What do they want me to say?’ the hidden curriculum at work in the medical school selection process: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ 2012; 12: 1–9.10.1186/1472-6920-12-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-17
- Razack S, Lessard D, Hodges BD, Maguire MH, Steinert Y. The more it changes; the more it remains the same: a Foucauldian analysis of Canadian policy documents relevant to student selection for medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19:161–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9468-2
- Hafferty FW. Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73:403–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199804000-00013
- Tummers L. Public policy and behavior change. Public Admin Rev 2019; 79: 925–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13109.
- Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6), 463–474. http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.889814.
- Government of Canada SC. Classification of gender. 2021. https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p3VD.pl?Function=getVD&TVD=1326727 [Accessed on Apr 19, 2022].
- AFMC. Canadian Medical Education Statistics 2020. Ottawa, ON.
- Beran T. Research Advances in Conformity to Peer Pressure: A Negative Side Effect of Medical Education. Health Profess Educ. 2015; 1: 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2015.11.004.
- De Freitas C, Buckley R, Klimo R, et al. Admissions experiences of aspiring physicians from low-income backgrounds. Med Ed. 2021; 55: 840–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14462.
- Michalec B, Hafferty FW. Examining the U.S. premed path as an example of discriminatory design & exploring the role(s) of capital. Soc Theory Health 2022; 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-022-00175-7.
- Grace MK. Subjective social status and premedical students’ attitudes towards medical school. Soc Sci Med 2017; 184: 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.004.