Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Christ, T. J. (2007). Experimental control and threats to internal validity of concurrent and nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20237
- Fisher, W. W., Kelley, M. E. et Lomas, J. E. (2003). Visual aids and structured criteria for improving visual inspection and interpretation of single-case designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-387
- Krueger, T. K., Rapp, J. T., Ott, L. M., Lood, E. A. et Novotny, M. A. (2013). Detecting false positives in AB designs: Potential implications for practitioners. Behavior Modification, 37, 615-630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445512468754
- Lanovaz, M. (2013). L’Utilisation de devis expérimentaux à cas unique en psychoéducation. Revue de psychoéducation, 42 (1), 161-183.
- Lanovaz, M. J., Giannakakos, A. R. et Destras, O. (2020). Machine learning to analyze single-case data: A proof of concept. Perspectives on Behavior Science. Prépublication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00244-0
- Lanovaz, M. J., Huxley, S. C. et Dufour, M.-M. (2017). Using the dual-criteria methods to supplement visual inspection: An analysis of nonsimulated data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 662-667. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.394
- Lanovaz, M. J., Turgeon, S., Cardinal, P. et Wheatly, T. L. (2019). Using single-case designs in practical settings: Is within-subject replication always necessary? Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0138-9
- Manolov, R. et Vannest, K. J. (2019). A visual aid and objective rule encompassing the data features of visual analysis. Behavior Modification. Prépublication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519854323
- Michiels, B. et Onghena, P. (2019). Randomized single-case AB phase designs: Prospects and pitfalls. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2454-2476. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1084-x
10.7202/1061728ar