Abstracts
Résumé
Le texte propose d’analyser les résultats de l’enquête triennale de l’Observatoirede la vie étudiante national en France (OVE), réalisée en 2010 sur un échantillonreprésentatif de 33 009 étudiants inscrits dans les différentes filières de l’enseignementsupérieur. Le questionnaire de l’OVE aborde, notamment, les pratiquesd’études et le contexte pédagogique des établissements en demandant aux étudiantsd’évaluer les différents aspects de leur environnement d’études. Les donnéesde cette enquête permettent de tester si les variables contextuelles exercentune influence sur l’attitude étudiante vis-à-vis des études. Trois variables compositessont utilisées pour examiner le rapport à l’environnement d’études : ledispositif pédagogique, la qualité pédagogique et le contexte humain. L’analysestatistique révèle l’existence d’une corrélation significative entre ces trois dimensionsdu contexte pédagogique et les manières d’étudier. L’attitude étudiante tendà changer avec le contexte : l’évaluation subjective de l’étudiant est susceptiblede devenir un vecteur important de son engagement et constitue la médiationentre le contexte et sa façon de concevoir et de pratiquer son investissement studieux.
Mots-clés :
- évaluation,
- contexte pédagogique,
- étudiants,
- France,
- enseignement supérieur,
- pratiques d’études,
- perception étudiante
Abstract
The text aims to analyze the results of the triennial survey of The National Ob -servatory of student Life on a representative sample of 33 009 students enrolledin various sectors of higher education (2010). The questionnaire focused on studentsliving and studying conditions and asked them to evaluate various aspectsof their learning environment. The survey results provide the opportunity to checkthe effect of contextual variables on student attitudes towards their studies. Threecomposite variables were used to examine the relationship with the learning environment:teaching organization, teaching quality and human context. statistical analysis reveals a significant correlation between these three dimensions ofcontext and how to be a student and the way to study. The attitude of studentstends to change with the context, their subjective evaluation is likely to becomean important vector for their commitment and turns into the mediation betweenthe context and how to organize and practice the studies.
Keywords:
- student perceptions,
- evaluation,
- student ratings,
- teaching context,
- France,
- higher education,
- students’ activity
Resumo
O texto propõe-se analisar os resultados do inquérito trienal do Observatório daVida Estudantil (OVE) em França, realizado em 2010 com uma amostra representativade 33 009 estudantes inscritos nos diferentes cursos do ensino superior.O questionário do OVE aborda, nomeadamente, as práticas de estudos e o contextopedagógico dos estabelecimentos que solicitam aos estudantes a avaliaçãodos diferentes aspetos do seu ambiente de estudo. Os dados deste questionário permitemtestar se as variáveis contextuais exercem influência sobre a atitude estudantilface aos estudos. Três variáveis compósitas são utilizadas para examinara relação com o ambiente de estudos: o dispositivo pedagógico, a qualidade pedagógicae o contexto humano. A análise estatística revela a existência de uma correlaçãosignificativa entre estas três dimensões do contexto pedagógico e dasmaneiras de estudar. A atitude estudantil tende a mudar: a avaliação subjetiva doestudante é suscetível de se tonar um vetor do seu compromisso e constitui amediação entre o contexto e o modo de conceber e de praticar o seu investimentono estudo.
Palavras chaves:
- avaliação,
- contexto pedagógico,
- estudantes,
- França,
- ensino superior,
- práticas de estudos,
- perceção do estudante
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-thanhuman world. New York, NY: Vintage.
- Alava, S., & Romainville, M. (2001). Les pratiques d’étude, entre socialisation et cognition. Revue française de pédagogie, 136, 159-180. doi:10.3406/rfp.2001.2836
- Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2010). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago, IL: university of Chicago Press.
- Biggs, J. B. (1990, July). Teaching design for learning. Keynote discussion paper presented at the annual Conference of the Higher Education research and Development society of australasia (HERDSA). Brisbane, Australia.
- Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian. Council for Educational research.
- Boekaerts, M. (2001). Motivation, learning and instruction. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 15 (pp. 1012-1017). Oxford: Elsevier.
- Coulon, A. (1997). Le métier d’étudiant. L’entrée dans la vie universitaire. Paris: PUF.
- Entwistle, N. J. (1998). Improving teaching through research on student learning. In J. F. J. Forest (Ed.), University teaching. International perspectives (pp. 73-112). New York & London: Garland Publishing.
- Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, A. C. (1997). Revision and the experience of understanding. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 145-158). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
- Forest, J. F. J. (1998) (Eds.). University teaching. International perspectives. New York & London: Garland Publishing.
- Frenay, M. (1998). Favoriser un apprentissage de qualité. In M. Frenay, B. Noël, P. Parmantier, & M. Romainville (Eds.), L’étudiant-apprenant. Grilles de lecture pour l’enseignement universitaire (pp. 111-128). Bruxelles: De Boeck & Larcier.
- Frenay, M., Noël, B., Parmantier, P., & Romainville, M. (1998). L’étudiant-apprenant. Grilles de lecture pour l’enseignement universitaire. Bruxelles: De Boeck & Larcier.
- Galland, O., Verley, E., & Vourc’h, R. (2011). Les mondes étudiants. Enquête conditions de vie 2010. Paris: La Documentation francaise.
- Garrison, D. R., Andrews, J., & Magnusson, K. (1995). Approaches to teaching and learning in higher education. New Currents, 2.1. Retrieved from: http://www.ucalgary.ca/pubs/newsletters/Currents/vol2.1/approaches.html
- Hermet, I. (2000). Engagement dans la recherche et rapport du sujet au savoir à l'Université. Genèse du choix de l'histoire et des mathématiques (thèse de doctorat non publiée). Université Toulouse - Le Mirail, Toulouse.
- Hickey, D. T. (1997). Motivation and contemporary socio-constructivist instructional perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 32, 175–193. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3203_3
- Jarvela, S., Jarvenoja, S., & Veermans, H. (2008). Understanding dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 122–135.
- Lahire, B. (2000). Conditions d’étude, manières d’étudier et pratiques culturelles. In C. Grignon (Ed.), Les conditions de vie des étudiants (pp. 241-381) . Paris: PUF.
- Light, G., & Cox, R. (2001). Learning and teaching in higher education. The reflective professional. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
- Mann, J. S. (2008). Study, Power and the University. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.
- Martin, E. (1999). Changing academic work. Developing the learning university. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.
- Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1-outcomes and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
- McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Educational psychology: social constructivism and educational practice: a case of emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 36, 133-140. doi:10.1207/s15326985EP3602_8
- Merle, P. (1997). Le rapport des étudiants a leurs études: enquête sur trois populations scolarisées dans des filières « fermées » et « ouvertes ». L’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle, 26, 367-387.
- Meyer, J. H. F., & Muller, M. W. (1990). Evaluating the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 15, 131-154. doi:10.1080/03075079012331377471
- Millet, M. (2003). Les étudiants et le travail universitaire. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
- Paivandi, S. (2012). La relation à l’apprendre a l’université. L’enquête sur la perspective d’apprentissage des étudiants de la région parisienne. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques, 2, 63-75.
- Paivandi, S. (2011). Le temps studieux des étudiants. In O. Galland, E. Verley, & R. Vourc’h (Eds.), Les mondes étudiants. Enquête conditions de vie 2010 (pp. 151-167). Paris: La Documentation francaise.
- Paivandi, S. (2010). L’acte d’apprendre à l’université: perspective sociologique. Document inedit. Universite Paris 8.
- Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
- Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Educaion. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.
- Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). The effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51 (3), 128-148. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02493.x
- Romainville, M. (1998). Les « nouveaux » étudiants. In M. Frenay, B. Noël, P. Parmantier, & M. Romainville (Eds.), L’étudiant-apprenant. Grilles de lecture pour l’enseignement universitaire (pp. 17-30) . Bruxelles: De Boeck & Larcier.
- Salomon, G. (1991). Learning: new conceptions, new opportunities. Educational Technology, 31 (6), 41-44.
- Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: university of Chicago
- Weidman, J. C. (1989). Undergraduate socialization. a conceptual approach. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education handbook of theory and research (pp. 289-322). New York, NY: Agathon.
- Weil, E. (1993). Essais sur la philosophie, la démocratie et l’éducation. Villeneuve d’Ascq, France: Presses universitaires de Lille.
- Wilson, K. L., Lissio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. studies in Higher Education, 22 (1), 33-53.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1-25). New York, NY: Springerverlag.