Abstracts
Abstract
The field of open education and research on the topic has notably expanded since the introduction of the term 20 years ago. Given these developments, a framework to structure research inquiry is necessary to ground and organize findings in open education. We propose the SCOPE framework for open education research: social justice, cost, outcomes, perceptions, and engagement. In this article, we explain how this framework emphasizes the need for social justice at the forefront of open education research. In addition, we incorporate existing theories in social justice, motivation, cognition, pedagogy, and engagement into each of the components to propose theoretical connections to future open education research. We suggest areas in which future research is needed. Finally, we conclude with suggestions as to how the SCOPE framework may be useful when connecting open education to open science and open scholarship as well as a call for considering intersectionality and critical methods in quantitative research (QuantCrit) in future inquiry.
Keywords:
- engagement,
- open education,
- motivation,
- research framework,
- social justice
Appendices
Bibliography
- Adams, K., & Dannick, S. (2022). Repairing the curriculum: Using OER to fill gaps. In C. J. Ivory & A. Pashia (Eds.), Using open educational resources to promote social justice (pp. 23–40). Association of College and Research Libraries. https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/booksanddigitalresources/digital/9780838936771_OA.pdf
- Adil, H. M., Ali, S., Sultan, M., Ashiq, M., & Rafiq, M. (2022). Open education resources’ benefits and challenges in the academic world: A systematic review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0049
- Apple, M., & Christian-Smith, L. (1991). The politics of the textbook (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315021089
- Azadbakht, E., Schultz, T., & Arellano, J. (2021). Not open for all: Accessibility of open textbooks. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 34(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.557
- Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565
- Barker, R. (2003). The social work dictionary (5th ed.). NASW Press.
- Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In J. S. Eccles & K. Salmela-Aro (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences: Motivational psychology (pp. 261–271). Elsevier.
- Belikov, O. M., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
- Blankstein, M. (2022). Ithaka S & R US Faculty Survey 2021. Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, Etc. University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Article 225. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/225
- Bliss, T. J., Robinson, T. J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04
- Blomgren, C., & McPherson, I. (2018). Scoping the nascent: An analysis of K–12 OER research 2012–2017. Open Praxis, 10(4), 359–375. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/207176/
- Brandle, S. (2020). It’s (not) in the reading: American government textbooks’ limited representation of historically marginalized groups. PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(4), 734–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000797
- Castillo, W., & Gillborn. D. (2022). How to “QuantCrit:” practices and questions for education data researchers and users. (EdWorkingPaper: 22-546). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/v5kh-dd65
- Clinton, V. (2018). Savings without sacrifices: A case study of open-source textbook adoption. Open Learning: The Journal of Distance and Open Learning, 33(3), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1486184
- Clinton, V. (2019). Cost, outcomes, use, and perceptions of open educational resources in psychology: A narrative review of the literature. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718799511
- Clinton, V., & Khan, S. (2019). Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: A meta-analysis. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872212
- Clinton-Lisell, V. (2021). Open pedagogy: A systematic review of empirical findings. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 255–268. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/511
- Clinton-Lisell, V. (2023). How does OER efficacy vary based on student age and course modality? American Journal of Distance Education, 37(3), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2077061
- Clinton-Lisell, V., & Gwozdz, L. (2023). Understanding student experiences of renewable and traditional assignments. College Teaching, 71(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2023.2179591
- Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827653
- Collyer, F. M. (2018). Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South. Current Sociology, 66(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116680020
- Crawford, C. E. (2019) The one-in-ten: Quantitative critical race theory and the education of the ‘new (white) oppressed’. Journal of Education Policy, 34(3), 423-444, https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1531314
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
- Croft, B., & Brown, M. (2020). Inclusive open education: Presumptions, principles, and practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757410
- Curby, T., McKnight, P., Alexander, L., & Erchov, S. (2020). Sources of variance in end-of-course student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1607249
- Deimann, M., & Farrow, R. (2013). Rethinking OER and their use: Open education as bildung. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1370
- DeRosa, R., & Robinson, S. (2017). From OER to open pedagogy: Harnessing the power of open. In R. Biswas-Diener & R. S. Jhangiani (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. Ubiquity Press. https://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/books/10.5334/bbc/read/#epubcfi(/6/2[id001]!/4/1:0)
- Domingo, C. R., Gerber, N. C., Harris, D., Mamo, L., Pasion, S. G., Rebanal, R. D., & Rosser, S. V. (2022). More service or more advancement: Institutional barriers to academic success for women and women of color faculty at a large public comprehensive minority-serving state university. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000292
- Fan, Y., Shepherd, L. J., Slavich, E., Waters, D., Stone, M., Abel, R., & Johnston, E. L. (2019). Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters. PLOS ONE, 14(2), Article e0209749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209749
- Farrow, R., Pitt, R., & Weller, M. (2020). Open textbooks as an innovation route for open science pedagogy. Education for Information, 36(3), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-190260
- Feldon, D. F., Callan, G., Juth, S., & Jeong, S. (2019). Cognitive load as motivational cost. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09464-6
- Fialkowski, M. K., Calabrese, A., Tilinghast, B., Titchenal, C. A., Meinke, W., Banna, J. C., & Draper, J. (2020). Open educational resource textbook impact on students in an introductory nutrition course. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 52(4), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2019.08.006
- Finley, S. C., Gray, B. M., & Martin, L. L. (2018). “Affirming our values”: African American scholars, white virtual mobs, and the complicity of white university administrators. Journal of Academic Freedom, 9, 1–20. https://www.aaup.org/JAF9/%E2%80%9Caffirming-our-values%E2%80%9D-african-american-scholars-white-virtual-mobs-and-complicity-white#.ZG1dWuzMJ6o
- Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002
- Fraser, F. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post-socialist” age. New Left Review, 1(212). https://newleftreview.org/I/212/nancy-fraser-from-redistribution-to-recognition-dilemmas-of-justice-in-a-post-socialist-age
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Grahe, J. E., Cuccolo, K., Leighton, D. C., & Cramblet Alvarez, L. D. (2020). Open science promotes diverse, just, and sustainable research and educational outcomes. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719869164
- Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: education, policy, ‘big data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417
- Griffiths, R., Mislevy, J., & Wang, S. (2022). Encouraging impacts of an open education resource degree initiative on college students’ progress to degree. Higher Education, 84(5), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00817-9
- Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44430383
- Hilton, J., III. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 573–590. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
- Hilton, J., III. (2020). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: A synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 853–876. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
- Hodgkinson-Williams, C. A., & Trotter, H. (2018). A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the global south. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.312
- Hollich, S. (2022). The unrealized promise of OER: An exploration of copyright, the open movement, and social justice. In C. J. Ivory & A. Pashia (Eds.), Using open educational resources to promote social justice (pp. 3–21). Association of College and Research Libraries. https://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/booksanddigitalresources/digital/9780838936771_OA.pdf
- hooks, bell. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203957769
- Howard, V. J., & Whitmore, C. B. (2020). Evaluating student perceptions of open and commercial psychology textbooks. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00139
- Hwang, G.-J., & Chien, S.-Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082
- Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9131-x
- Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5
- Jhangiani, R. S., Dastur, F. N., Le Grand, R., & Penner, K. (2018). As good or better than commercial textbooks: Students’ perceptions and outcomes from using open digital and open print textbooks. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.5
- Jordan, J. (2023). Compounded labor: Developing OER as a marginalized creator. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2023/compounded-labor-developing-oer-as-a-marginalized-creator/
- Kaerwer, K., & Pritchett, M. (2023). Critical race theory in education: How banning its tenets undermines our best hope for equity in education. Behavior and Social Issues, 32, 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00130-9
- Katz, S. (2019). Student textbook purchasing: The hidden cost of time. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 7(1), 12–18. https://jpaap.ac.uk/JPAAP/article/view/349
- Kew, S. N., & Tasir, Z. (2022). Learning analytics in online learning environment: A systematic review on the focuses and the types of student-related analytics data. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09541-2
- Kim, D., Lee, Y., Leite, W. L., & Huggins-Manley, A. C. (2020). Exploring student and teacher usage patterns associated with student attrition in an open educational resource-supported online learning platform. Computers & Education, 156, Article 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103961
- Kouzoukas, G. (2019). Engaging first generation students. In S. J. Quaye, S. R. Harper, & S. L. Pendakur (Eds.). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (pp. 287–306). Routledge.
- Krebs, R., Rothstein, B., & Roelle, J. (2022). Rubrics enhance accuracy and reduce cognitive load in self-assessment. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09302-1
- Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: A.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
- Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis) course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290
- Lantrip, J., & Ray, J. (2021). Faculty perceptions and usage of OER at Oregon community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 45(12), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2020.1838967
- McGowan, V. (2020). Institution initiatives and support related to faculty development of open educational resources and alternative textbooks. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562328
- Nagle, C., & Vitez, K. (2021). Fixing the broken textbook market. US PIRG. https://uspirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/Fixing%20the%20Broken%20Textbook%20Market%2C%203e%20February%202021.pdf
- Nouri, A., & Sajjadi, S. M. (2014). Emancipatory pedagogy in practice: Aims, principles and curriculum orientation. The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 5(2), 76–87. https://libjournal.uncg.edu/ijcp/article/view/228
- Nusbaum, A. T. (2020). Who gets to wield academic Mjolnir?: On worthiness, knowledge curation, and using the power of the people to diversify OER. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.559
- Nusbaum, A. T., & Cuttler, C. (2020). Hidden impacts of OER: Effects of OER on instructor ratings and course selection. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.00072
- Nusbaum, A. T., Cuttler, C., & Swindell, S. (2020). Open educational resources as a tool for educational equity: Evidence from an introductory psychology class. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2019.00152
- Open Education Group. (2023). The COUP framework. https://openedgroup.org/coup
- Omolade, B. (1993). A black feminist pedagogy. Women's Studies Quarterly, 21(3/4), 31-38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40022003
- Otto, D., Schroeder, N., Diekmann, D., & Sander, P. (2021). Trends and gaps in empirical research on open educational resources (OER): A systematic mapping of the literature from 2015 to 2019. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4), Article ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145
- Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
- Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2020). Cognitive-load theory: Methods to manage working memory load in the learning of complex tasks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 394–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420922183
- Pitt, R. (2015). Mainstreaming open textbooks: Educator perspectives on the impact of OpenStax College open textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.2381
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge.
- Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
- Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. Christenson, A.L. Reschley, & C. Wylie (Eds) Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.
- Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2022). Agentic engagement. In S. Christenson, A.L. Reschley, & C. Wylie (Eds) Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 95–107). Springer.
- Rideau, R. (2021). “We’re just not acknowledged”: An examination of the identity taxation of full-time non-tenure-track Women of Color faculty members. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000139
- Roberts-Crews, J. (2022, September 22). Assumptions about labor in open education [Keynote address]. Open Texas Conference, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
- Sablan, J. R. (2019). Can you really measure that? Combining critical race theory and quantitative methods. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 178–203. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3102/0002831218798325
- Samson, R.L., Clinton-Lisell, V., & Fischer, L. (2021). Let students choose: Examining the impact of open educational resources on performance in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(3), 745-755. https://doi.org/10.1021.acs.jcemed.0c00595
- Santos, A. (2018). Instructional strategies for game-based learning. In Gamification in education: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 472–481). IGI Global.
- Schultz, T. A., & Azadbakht, E. (2021). Open but not for all: A survey of open educational resource librarians on accessibility. College & Research Libraries, 82(5), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.5.755
- Seiferle-Valencia, M. (2020). It’s not (just) about the cost: Academic libraries and intentionally engaged OER for social justice. Library Trends, 69(2), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2020.0042
- Spica, E. (2023). Inclusive access: A multi-institutional study of academic outcomes from a statewide community college automatic billing e-textbook pilot. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 47(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2021.1990161
- Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
- Thomas, W. J., & Bernhardt, B. R. (2018). Helping keep the costs of textbooks for students down: Two approaches. Technical Services Quarterly, 35(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2018.1456844
- Thomas, A., Dunbar, E., Wharton, R. M., & Greco, A. N. (2022). The impact of the inclusive access antitrust lawsuit on US college bookstores, book publishers, and educational publishers. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(3), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09905-1
- Tietjen, P., & Asino, T. I. (2021). What is open pedagogy? Identifying commonalities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5161
- Tillinghast, B., Fialkowski, M. K., & Draper, J. (2020). Exploring aspects of open educational resources through OER-enabled pedagogy. Frontiers in Education, 5(76). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2020.00076
- Tlili, A., Altinay, F., Huang, R., Altinay, Z., Olivier, J., Mishra, S., Jemni, M., & Burgos, D. (2022). Are we there yet? A systematic literature review of open educational resources in Africa: A combined content and bibliometric analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(1), Article e0262615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262615
- Todorinova, L., & Wilkinson, Z. T. (2020). Incentivizing faculty for open educational resources (OER) adoption and open textbook authoring. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(6), Article 102220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102220
- Van Allen, J., & Katz, S. (2019). Developing open practices in teacher education: An example of integrating OER and developing renewable assignments. Open Praxis, 11(3), 311–319. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.767590955332474
- Vojtech, G., & Grissett, J. (2017). Student perceptions of college faculty who use OER. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3032
- Weller, M. (2020). Open and free access to education for all. In D. Burgos (Ed.), Radical solutions and open science: An open approach to boost higher education (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4276-3_1
- Weller, M. (2022). The rise and development of digital education. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education (pp. 1–17). Springer.
- Werth, E., & Williams, K. (2021). What motivates students about open pedagogy? Motivational regulation through the lens of self-determination theory. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5373
- Wiley, D. A. (2021). Open educational resources: Undertheorized research and untapped potential. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09907-w
- Wiley, D. (2014, March 5). The access compromise and the 5th R. Improving Learning. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
- Wiley, D., & Hilton Iii, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
- Winkelmes, M. A., Boye, A., & Tapp, S. (2019). Transparent design in higher education. Stylus Publishing.
- Wynants, S., & Dennis, J. (2022). Redesigning a research methods course with personalized, interactive OER: A case study of student perceptions and performance. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 22(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i1.31706
- Young, J., & Young, J. (2022). Decoding the data dichotomy: applying QuantCrit to understand racially conscience intersectional meta-analytic research. International Journal of research & method in education, 45(4), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2093847