Abstracts
Abstract
Completing doctoral dissertations is difficult work and may be harder for distance students physically separated from institutional and collegial supports. Inability to complete independent research contributes to doctoral student attrition. Factors impacting completion include institutional factors, student characteristics, and supervisory arrangements (Manathunga, 2005). This paper shares proactive strategies used by a Midwestern university in the United States to support distance doctoral students. Strategies and technology tools are described that (a) cultivate a shared culture of responsibility and commitment, (b) increase effective communication between researchers, and (c) grow departmental and institutional services and technologies for faculty and students. This paper suggests the use of a specific framework to help students develop a shared culture of responsibility. This framework encourages students to discuss their social network, as well as teaches students how to manage their split life by using a tool which evaluates a student’s readiness for the dissertation process and maps out where dissertation skills and knowledge are developed throughout the program. Strategies for effective communication include availability, effective feedback, trust, and humor. Services and technologies provided to build capacity include the use of online and library resources, campus-wide use of research software, writing and research services, and department supports and processes to promote student research. These mechanisms for accountability, mentoring, training, and trust increase the likelihood of success.
Keywords:
- dissertation completion,
- distance doctoral students,
- graduate student services,
- online doctoral programs
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aghaee, N., Jobe, W. B., Karunaratne, T., Smedberg, Å., Hansson, H., & Tedre, M. (2016). Interaction gaps in PhD education and ICT as a way forward: Results from a study in Sweden. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2220
- Alaby, J. A. (2002). The end or ends of education? The issue of means and ends of the Andrews University Leadership Program (Doctoral disertation). ProQuest Digital Dissertations database. (3058305)
- Ali, A., & Kohun, F. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, 21-33. doi: 10.28945/58
- Ali, A., Kohun, F., & Levy, Y. (2007). Dealing with social isolation to minimize doctoral attrition- A four stage framework. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2(1), 33-49. doi: 10.28945/56
- Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 79-107. doi: 10.28945/3958
- Baker, C. (2010). The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. The Journal of Educators Online, 7(1), 1-30. doi: 10.9743/JEO.2010.1.2
- Berry, S. (2017). Building community in online doctoral classrooms: Instructor practices that support community. Online Learning, 21(2). doi: 10.24059/olj.v21i2.875
- Bolker, J. (1998). Writing your dissertation in fifteen minutes a day. New York, NY: Owl Books.
- Bondy, E., Shannon, D., Eda, M. C., & Munarriz-Diaz, R. (2017). Recentering job-embedded graduate education for practicing teachers. Teacher Education and Practice, 30(1), 38-57. Retrieved from https://go.galegroup.com
- Breen, J. M., & Martin, J. (2018). Teaching leadership research courses online at the doctoral level: Why we do it and how it works. In L. Hyatt & S. Allen (Eds.), Advancing Doctoral Leadership Education Through Technology (pp. 155-175). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Cassuto, L. (2010). Advising the dissertation student who won’t finish. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 57(7). Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/Advising-the-Dissertation/124782
- Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2000). Doctoral students’ access to research cultures--Are some more unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-165. doi: 10.1080/713696138
- Denman, P. M., Corrales, J. M., Smyth, S., & Craven, K. (2018). From ABD to PhD: A qualitative study examining the benefits of a support group during dissertation in an online doctoral program. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(2), 106-114. doi: 10.1080/07377363.2018.1469067
- Dombroski, K., Watkins, A. F., Fitt, H., Frater, J., Banwell, K., Mackenzie, K.,... Hart, D. (2018). Journeying from “I” to “we”: Assembling hybrid caring collectives of geography doctoral scholars. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(1), 80-93. doi: 10.1080/03098265.2017.1335295
- Duesbery, L., Frizelle, S., Twyman, T., Naranjo, J., & Timmermans, K. (2019). Developing and designing open border teacher education programs: Case studies in online higher education. Journal of Educators Online, 16(1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1204380
- Fahlman, D. W. (2009). The first doctoral program in distance education in North America. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 124-136. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.711
- Faranda, W. T. (2015). The effects of instructor service performance, immediacy, and trust on student-faculty out-of-class communication. Marketing Education Review, 25(2), 83-97. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130254
- Freed, S., Covrig, D., & Baumgartner, E. (2010). Learning while leading: The Andrews University Leadership Program. Journal of Applied Christian Leadership, 4(1), 26-55. Retrieved from https://www.andrews.edu/services/jacl/article_archive/4_1_spring_2010/05-art_learning_whil.pdf
- Fung, A. S. K., Southcott, J., & Siu, F. L. (2017). Exploring mature-aged students’ motives for doctoral study and their challenges: A cross border research collaboration. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12(1), 175-195. doi: 10.28945/3790
- Garcia, C. E., & Yao, C. W. (2019). The role of an online first-year seminar in higher education doctoral students’ scholarly development. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.002
- Goodboy, A. K., Booth-Butterfield, M., Bolkan, S., & Griffin, D. J. (2015). The role of instructor humor and students’ educational orientations in student learning, extra effort, participation, and out-of-class communication. Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 44-61. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2014.965840
- Grady, M. L. (2016). Doctoral students in a distance program: Advising and degree completion strategies. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 12(2), 49-52. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1139130
- Harrison, R., Gemmell, I., & Reed, K. (2014). Student satisfaction with a Web-based dissertation course: Findings from an international distance learning master’s programme in public health. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1665
- Jairam, D., & Kahl, D. H., Jr. (2012). Navigating the doctoral experience: The role of social support in successful degree completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 311-329. doi: 10.28945/1700
- Kearns, H., Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!). Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 77-89. doi: 10.1080/07294360701658781
- Kelley, M. J., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. D. (2016). The role of self-regulation in doctoral students’ status of all but dissertation (ABD). Innovative Higher Education, 41(1), 87-100. doi: 10.1007/s10755-015-9336-5
- Kennedy, D. H., Terrell, S. R., & Lohle, M. (2015). A grounded theory of persistence in a limited-residency doctoral program. The Qualitative Report, 20(3), 215-230. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss3/5
- King, M. F. (2008). Ph. D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline demographic data from the Ph. D. completion project (1933042184) [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from https://cgsnet.org/phd-completion-project
- Kirkpatrick, K. J. (2019). Online doctoral students writing for scholarly publication. Computers and Composition, 52, 19-36. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2019.01.012
- Kumar, S., & Coe, C. (2017). Mentoring and student support in online doctoral programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 128-142. doi: 10.1080/08923647.2017.1300464
- Kumar, S., Dawson, K., Black, E. W., Cavanaugh, C., & Sessums, C. D. (2011). Applying the community of inquiry framework to an online professional practice doctoral program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 126-142. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.978
- Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Lovitts, B. E. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- Lovitts, B. E., & Wert, E. L. (2009). Developing quality dissertations in the social sciences: A graduate student’s guide to achieving excellence (1st ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- Maki, P., & Borkowski, N. A. (2006). The assessment of doctoral education: Emerging criteria and new models for improving outcomes. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- Manathunga, C. (2005). Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 219-233. doi: 10.1080/1356251042000337963
- Naughton, N., & Redfern, S. (2002). Collaborative virtual environments to support communication and community in Internet-based distance education. Journal of Information Technology Education, 1(3), 201-211. doi: 10.1.1.106.72
- Nerad, M., & Miller, D. S. (1997). The institution cares: Berkeley’s efforts to support dissertation writing in the humanities and social sciences. New Directions for Higher Education, 1997(99), 75-90. doi: 10.1002/he.9907
- Newman, I., & Covrig, D. M. (2013). Building consistency between title, problem statement, purpose, & research questions to improve the quality of research plans and reports. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 25(1), 70-79. doi: 10.1002/nha.20009
- Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 3-19. doi: 10.1080/0260293042000160384
- Oregon, E., McCoy, L., & Carmon-Johnson, L. (2018). Case analysis: Exploring the application of using rich media technologies and social presence to decrease attrition in an online graduate program. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2), 1-13. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1186019
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Ross, J., Gallagher, M. S., & Macleod, H. (2013). Making distance visible: Assembling nearness in an online distance learning programme. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1545
- Silvia, P. J. (2007). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Sowell, R. S. (2008). PhD completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline program data [Data file and coding book]. Retrieved from https://cgsnet.org/phd-completion-project
- Sowell, R. S. (2009). Ph. D. completion and attrition: Findings from exit surverys for Ph. D. completers (1933042222) [Data file and coding book]. Retrieved from https://cgsnet.org/phd-completion-project
- Sowell, R. S., Zhang, T., Bell, N. E., & Kirby, S. N. (2010). PhD completion and attrition: Policies and practices to promote student success [Data file and coding book]. Retrieved from https://cgsnet.org/phd-completion-project
- Terrell, S. R., Snyder, M. M., & Dringus, L. P. (2009). The development, validation, and application of the Doctoral Student Connectedness Scale. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.004
- van Rhijn, T., Murray, S. H., & Mizzi, R. (2018). Partners in learning?: A qualitative study of the intimate relationships of partnered mature students in postsecondary education. Journal of Professional, Continuing, and Online Education, 3(1), 1-24. doi: 10.18741/jpcoe36
- Violanti, M. T., Kelly, S. E., Garland, M. E., & Christen, S. (2018). Instructor clarity, humor, immediacy, and student learning: Replication and extension. Communication Studies, 69(3), 251-262. doi: 10.1080/10510974.2018.1466718
- Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wagner, E., Enders, J., Pirie, M., & Thomas, D. (2016). Supporting academic integrity in a fully-online degree completion program through the use of synchronous video conferences. Journal of Information Systems Education, 27(3), 159-173. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1151242
- Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Walters, K., & Henry, P. (2016). Critical analysis of embedded and summative feedback from online doctoral instructors on benchmark major assessments. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(1). Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/231
- Walters, K. J., Henry, P., Vinella, M., Wells, S., Shaw, M., & Miller, J. (2015). The genre of instructor feedback in doctoral programs: A corpus linguistic analysis. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(4), 525-550. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1084306
- Williams, J. K., & Todd, R. H. (2016). Debriefing the interpretive researcher: Spider sniffing with critical friend. The Qualitative Report, 21(12), 2161-2175. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss12/1
- Williams, P. E., Wall, N., & Fish, W. (2019). Mid-career adult learners in an online doctoral program and the drivers of their academic self-regulation: The importance of social support and parent education level. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3789