Abstracts
Abstract
Editathons are a relatively new type of learning event, which enable participants to create or edit Wikipedia content on a particular topic. This paper explores the experiences of nine participants of an editathon at the University of Edinburgh on the topic of the Edinburgh Seven, who were the first women to attend medical school in 19th century United Kingdom. This study draws on the critical approach to learning technology to position and explore an editathon as a learning opportunity to increase participants’ critical awareness of how the Internet, open resources, and Wikipedia are shaping how we engage with information and construct knowledge. Within this, there is a particular focus on recognising persisting gender inequities and biases online. The qualitative interviews captured rich narrative learning stories, which traced the journey participants took during the editathon. Participants transformed from being online information consumers to active contributors (editors), prompting new critical understandings and an evolving sense of agency. The participants’ learning was focused in three primary areas: (1) a rewriting of history that redresses gender inequities and the championing of the female voice on Wikipedia (both as editors and subject matter); (2) the role of Wikipedia in shaping society’s access to and engagement with information, particularly information on traditionally marginalised subjects, and the interplay of the individual and the collective in developing and owning that knowledge; and (3) the positioning of traditional media in the digital age.
Keywords:
- editathon,
- critical approach,
- gender,
- Wikipedia,
- learning
Download the article in PDF to read it.
Download
Appendices
Bibliography
- Antin, J., Yee, R., Cheshire, C., & Nov, O. (2011). Gender differences in Wikipedia editing. Paper presented at the ACM WikiSym, Mountain View, California.
- Bakardijieva, M., & Smith, R. (2001). The internet in everyday life: Computer networking from the standpoint of the domestic user. New Media & Society, 3(1). doi: 10.1177/1461444801003001005
- Barad K. (2007). Meeting the universe half-way. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Cohen, N. (2011, January 30). Define gender gap? Look up Wikipedia's contributor list. The New York Times Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/31/business/media/31link.html
- Collier, B., & Bear, J. (2012). Conflict, criticism, or confidence: An empirical examination of the gender gap in Wikipedia contributions. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 383-392). New York: ACM.
- Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. London: Polity.
- Ebersbach, A. & Glaser, M. (2004). Towards emancipatory use of a medium: The Wiki. International Journal of Information Ethics, 2(11), 1-9.
- Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113-136.
- Fenwick, R. (2015). Sociomateriality and Learning: a critical approach. In D. Scott & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Learning. [E-reader Version]. doi: 10.4135/9781473915213.n8
- Fenwick, T., Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualising professional learning, knowledge and practice (Introduction). Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 1-13.
- Filipacchi, A. (2013, April 27). Wikipedia's sexism. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism.html
- Glott, R., Ghosh, R., & Schmidt, P. (2010). Wikipedia survey: Overview of results. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT. Retrieved from http://www.ris.org/uploadi/editor/1305050082Wikipedia_Overview_15March2010-FINAL.pdf
- Graells-Garrido, E., Lalmas, M., & Menczer, F. (2015). First women, second sex: Gender bias in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM conference on hypertext (pp. 165-174). New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2700171.2791036.
- Gunter, H. (2009). The ‘C' word in educational research. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 93-102.
- Hargittai, E. & Shaw, A. (2015). Mind the skills gap: The role of Internet know-how and gender in differentiated contributions to Wikipedia. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 424-442. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.957711
- Harp, D., & Tremayne, M. (2006). The gendered Blogosphere: Examining inequality using network and feminist theory. J&MC Quarterly, 83(2), 247-264.
- Hill, B. M., & Shaw, A. (2013). The Wikipedia gender gap revisited: Characterizing survey response bias in peer production communities. PLOS ONE, 8(6), e65782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065782
- Knorr-Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361-375.
- Knorr-Cetina, K. (2008). Objectual practice. In M. Mazzotti (Ed.), Knowledge as social order: Rethinking the sociology of barry barnes (p. 83-98). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
- Lam, S. K., Uduwage, A., Dong, Z., Sen, S., Musicant, D. R., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2011). WP: clubhouse? An exploration of Wikipedia's gender imbalance. In WikiSym 2011 Conference Proceedings - 7th Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (pp. 1-10). doi: 10.1145/2038558.2038560
- Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2018). Becoming an online editor: Perceived roles and responsibilities of Wikipedia editors. Information Research, 23(1).
- Manovich, L. (2009). The practice of everyday (Media) life: From mass consumption to mass cultural production? Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 319-331.
- Melluci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
- Miles, M. & Huberman, A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
- Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 373-384.
- Reagle J., & Rhue, L. (2011). Gender bias in Wikipedia and Britannica. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1138-1158.
- Selwyn, N. (2008). Developing the technological imagination: Theorising the social shaping and consequences of new technologies. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Theorising the benefits of new technology for youth (pp. 18-28). London: London School of Economics.
- Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 65-73.
- Shaw, A. (2014). The internet is full of jerks, because the world is full of jerks: What feminist theory teaches us about the internet. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(3), 273-277.
- Sorensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wagner, C., Graells-Garrido, E., Garcia, D., & Menczer, F. (2016). Women through the glass ceiling: gender asymmetries in Wikipedia. EPJ Data Science, 5(5), 1-24.
- Wikipedia (2016). Wikipedia: Neutral point of view. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
- Wikimedia Foundation (2011). Wikipedia Editors Study; Results from the editor survey. Retrieved from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Editor_Survey_Report_-_April_2011.pdf