Abstracts
Abstract
Rapid development of communication tools has brought about contentious issues in communication management in distance learning (DL) programs. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships between communication management indicators, namely, communication practices, communication tools, and students' cognitive engagement in distance learning programs. A conceptual framework for communication management was developed from Moore’s Transactional Distance Learning Theory (TDLT) and other existing literature. This study was conducted using quantitative research design. A questionnaire (a survey method) was used to elicit responses from 450 randomly selected in-service teachers from three Malaysian Public universities that offer blended mode distance-learning programs. Data analysis was conducted using Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) software to test the structural path of communication practices, communication tools, and students' cognitive engagement. Tests of hypotheses provided evidence of measures of fit statistics. The findings provide evidences that effective communication practices and communication tools have strong positive influence on distance students’ cognitive engagement.
Keywords:
- communication management,
- cognitive engagement,
- communication practices,
- communication tools,
- distance learners
Appendices
Bibliography
- Ahmad, T. B. T., Basha, K. M., Marzuki, A. M., Hisham, N. A., & Sahari, M. (2010). Faculty's acceptance of computer-based technology: Cross-validation of an extended model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 268-279. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/ahmad.html
- Almarashdeh, I., Nur Fazidah, E., Noraidah, S., & Nor Azan, M. Z. (2013). Development of an interactive learning management system for Malaysian distance learning institutions Middle-East. Journal of Scientific Research, 14(11).
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Conflicted: Faculty and online education, 2012. Babson Park, MA.
- Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535214.pdf
- Anderson, T. (2003a). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/149/230
- Angelaki, C. (2013). Communication and social presence: The impact on adult students' emotions in distance learning. Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 18(1), 78-93.
- Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: a framework for evaluating online teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 217-232. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003
- Bahroom, R., & Abdol Latif, L. (2012). Open and distance learning as the key driver of lifelong learning. Proceeding Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education Seminar on Life Long Learning Seminar: PWTT, Kuala Lumpur, 22-23 September 2012.
- Belcher, A. R., Hall, B. M., Kelley, K., & Pressey, K. L. (2015). An analysis of faculty promotion of critical thinking and peer interaction within threaded discussions. Online Learning, 19(4).
- Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e-learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design Distance Education, 30(1) 5-21. doi: 10.1080/01587910902845972
- Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217-231. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol13/JITEv13ResearchP217-231Bouhnik0601.pdf
- Burgess, J. (2006). Transactional distance theory and student satisfaction. (Doctorate dissertation, The University of West Florida). Retrieved from http://uwf.edu/vburgess/Final_Dissertation.pdf
- Calvo, R., Arbiol, A., & Iglesias, A. (2014). Are all chats suitable for learning purposes? A study of the required characteristics. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 251-260.
- Chen, Y.-J. (2001). Dimensions of transactional distance in the World Wide Web learning environment: A factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4). 459-470. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00213
- Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
- Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.cqu.eblib.com.ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/EBLWeb/patron/
- Creedon, S. (2007). Preparing nurses on-line to work off-line: Experiences gained from teaching final year undergraduate nursing students in Ireland. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 11(1). Retrieved from http://ojni.org/11_1/creedon.htm
- Dzakiria, H. (2004). Technology does not always teach distance students, but effective distance teachers do. Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), 1823-1144.
- Dzakiria, H. (2012). Illuminating the importance of learning interaction to open distance learning (ODL) success: A qualitative perspectives of adult students in Perlis, Malaysia. The Journal of Open Distance Learning, 16(59), 111-125.
- Dzakiria, H., & Kasim, A. (2002). ICT acceptance and enthusiasm: A case study of University Utara Malaysia Students, Malaysian. Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 67-76.
- Fallon, G. (2011). Making the connection: Moore's theory of transactional distance and its relevance to the use of a virtual classroom in postgraduate online teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 187-209.
- Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.
- Guffey, M. E. (2008). Business communication: Process & product. Mason, OH: Southwestern, Cengage Learning.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Student interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 3-42.
- Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Journal of Information & Management, 45, 499-506.
- Kaur, A. (2006). E-learning challenges as perceived by communities of practice: Open University.
- Malaysia's experiences. Asian Association of Open University (AAOU) Journal, 2(1), 51-65.
- Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. Information Science Publishing (an imprint of idea group), Covent Garden, London.
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
- Lammers, W. J., & Gillaspy J. A. Jr. (2013). Brief measure of student instructor rapport predicts student success in online courses. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2).
- Lear, J. L., Ansorge, C., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Interactivity/community process. Model for the Online Education Environment, 6(1), 71-77.
- Lemone, K. A. (2005). Analyzing Cultural Influences on E-Learning Transactional Issues. Proceeding of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2637-2644). Vancouver, Canada.
- Lentell, H. (2003). The importance of the tutor in open and distance learning. In A. Tait & R. Mills (Eds.), Rethinking student support in distance education change and continuity in an international context. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
- Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education.(2015). Blueprint 2015-2025 executive summary Kementerian Pendidikan. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my
- McCrory, R., Putnam, R., & Jansen, A.(2008). Interaction in online courses for teacher education: Subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 155-801.
- McGivney, R. (2004). Technologies of online learning (E-learning). In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University.
- Mei, L., Su L.W., Ahmad, F. A., & Rosnaini, M. (2017). Teachers' perceptions of e-learning in Malaysian secondary schools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2) 20-33.
- Ministry of Higher Education.(2010). Report on the Implementation of the National Higher Education Strategic Plan: Planning and research division. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my
- Ministry of High Education. (2015). Graduation determination review: Employment and status of employment. Putrajaya, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my
- Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
- Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). London, UK: Routledge.
- Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systematic view of online learning (3rd ed.). Belmont, VA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth.
- Murphy, K. L., & Cifuentes, L. (2001). Using Web tools, collaborating, and learning online. Distance Education: An International Journal, 22(2), 285-305.
- Neumann, M. S., & Yu. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 297-321.
- Noraini, C. H. (2010). Economic literacy among Malaysian students and student teachers: Education system in Malaysia. Saarbrücken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
- Partlow, K. M., & Gibbs, W. J. (2003). Indicators of constructivist principles in Internet-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 68-97.
- Rajasegeran, R. (2012). Blended discrete trial clinical method to enhance performance in e-learning mathematics courses(B7). Conference proceeding of Smart innovations in Education and lifelong learning. Muang Thong Thani, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
- Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Lygo-Baker, S., Ma, H. W. S., & Rees, R. (2016). Why some teachers easily learn to use a new virtual learning environment: a technology acceptance perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 539-552.
- Robbie, D. (2005). Students use and experiences of Bb at Swinburne: A longitudinal study 2001-2005. Paper presented at the Blackboard Asia Pacific Users Conference, Melbourne.
- Saba, F. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/issue/view/4/337
- Sadat, A. & Rahman K. M. R. (2003 12-14 November). Prospect of email communication as an educational tool for distance education in Bangladesh theme. Paper presented at Provision for youth and young children Annual Conference, Thailand.
- Sa'don, N. F. B., Dahlan, H. B. M., & Zainal, H. B. (2013, November). Derivation for design of virtual learning environment (VLE) framework for Malaysian schools. Conference proceeding of International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS; pp. 570-575). IEEE.
- Sekaran, U., & Bougie R. (2010). Research methods for business (5th ed.). Haddington, East Lothian: Scotprint.
- Shirin, H.B., Sharifah Sariah Syed, H., & Mohammad, S. I. (2014). Interaction in e-learning environment: Does it fulfill with Islamic teaching? Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management 2(4), 36-52.
- Shuttleworth, M. (2009). Content validity. Retrieved from https://explorable.com/content-validity
- Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 44(1), 51-54.
- Steel, C. (2009). Reconciling university teacher beliefs to create learning designs for LMS environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 399-420.
- Swerling, J., & Thorson, K. (2014). The role and status of communication practice in the USA and Europe. Journal of Communication Management, 18(1), 2-15.
- Taylor, D. (2006). Issues, trends, and challenges in distance education: An international perspective, e- Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 4(1), 41-25.
- Trevithick, P., Richards, S., Ruch, G., Moss, B., Lines, L., & Manor, O. (2004). Teaching and learning communication skills in social work education. London, United Kingdom: Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE).
- Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010) Student engagement evidence summary. York: Higher Education Academy. Available at http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/studentengagement/StudentEngagementEvidenceSummary.pdf
- Wahlstedt, A., & Honkaranta, A. (2007). Bridging the gap between advanced distributed teaching and the use of learning management systems in the university context. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Proceedings of a meeting held 18-20 July 2007, Niigata, Japan.
- Yu, F. Y., & Yu, H. J. (2002). Incorporating e-mail into the learning process: its impact on student academic achievement and attitudes. Computers and Education Journal, 38(117). 117-126.
- Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.