Abstracts
Abstract
The capacity to foster interpersonal interactions in massive open online courses (MOOCs) has frequently been contested, particularly when learner interactions are limited to MOOC forums. The establishment of social presence—a perceived sense of somebody being present and “real”—is among the strategies to tackle the challenges of online learning and could be applied in MOOCs. Thus far, social presence in MOOCs has been under-researched. Studies that previously examined social presence in MOOCs did not account for the peculiar nature of open online learning. In contrast to the existing work, this study seeks to understand how learners perceive social presence, and the different nuances of social presence in diverse MOOC populations. In particular, we compare perceptions of social presence across the groups of learners with different patterns of forum participation in three edX MOOCs. The findings reveal substantial differences in how learners with varying forum activity perceive social presence. Perceptions of social presence also differed in courses with the varying volume of forum interaction and duration. Finally, learners with sustained forum activity generally reported higher social presence scores that included low affectivity and strong group cohesion perceptions. With this in mind, this study is significant because of the insights into brings to the current body of knowledge around social presence in MOOCs. The study’s findings also raise questions about the effectiveness of transferring existing socio-constructivist constructs into the MOOC contexts.
Keywords:
- social presence,
- MOOCs,
- forum participation
Appendices
Bibliography
- Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22.
- Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(6), 65-83. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.765
- Appiah-Kubi, K., & Rowland, D. (2016). PEER support in MOOCs: The role of social presence. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 237-240). New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2876034.2893423
- Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 435-447.
- Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
- Bergner, Y., Kerr, D., & Pritchard, D. E. (2015). Methodological challenges in the analysis of MOOC data for exploring the relationship between discussion forum views and learning outcomes. In O. Santos, J. Boticario, C. Romero, M. Pechenizkiy, A. Merceron, P. Mitros, J. ... M. Desmarais (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM'15), Madrid, Spain (pp. 234-241). Retrieved from http://www.educationaldatamining.org/EDM2015/uploads/papers/paper_61.pdf
- Boroujeni, M., Hecking, T., Hoppe, H. U., & Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Dynamics of MOOC discussion forums. In Proceedings of the 7th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK17), 128-137. doi: 10.1145/3027385.3027391
- Boston, W. E., Ice, P., Díaz, S. R., Richardson, J., Gibson, A. M., & Swan, K. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between indicators of the community of inquiry framework and retention in online programs. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 67-83.
- Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Carlon, S., Bennett-Woods, D., Berg, B., Claywell, L., LeDuc, K., Marcisz, N. ... Zenoni, L. (2012). The community of inquiry instrument: Validation and results in online health care disciplines. Computers & Education, 59(2), 215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.004
- Cheung, E. (2014). Analyzing student engagement and retention in Georgetown's first MOOC: Globalization's winners and losers: Challenges for developed and developing Countries. (Master's thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10822/709735
- Coffrin, C., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., & Kennedy, G. (2014). Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK'14), 83-92. doi: 10.1145/2567574.2567586
- Damm, C. A. (2016). Applying a community of inquiry instrument to measure student engagement in large online courses. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 3(1).
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3(18). doi: 10.5334/2012-18
- Díaz, S. R., Swan, K., Ice, P., & Kupczynski, L. (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 22-30.
- Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
- Eynon, R., Gillani, N., Hjorth, I., and Yasseri, T. (2014). Conceptualising interaction and learning in MOOCs. MOOC Research Initiative. Retrieved from http://lntrg.education.ox.ac.uk/projects/conceptualising-interaction-and-learning-in-moocs/
- Ferguson, R., & Clow, D. (2015). Examining engagement: Analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 51-58). Poughkeepsie, New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2723576.2723606
- Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. L. Rogers, G. A. Berg, J. V. Boettcher, L. Howard, L. Justice, & K. D. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (2nd ed., pp. 352-355). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The community of inquiry theoretical framework. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (3rd ed., pp. 104-119). Routledge.
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
- Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
- Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147-166.
- Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26. doi: 10.1080/08923649709526970
- Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E., Rodríguez-Sabiote, C., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2015). Cognitive presence through social and teaching presence in communities of inquiry: A correlational-predictive study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3). doi: 10.14742/ajet.1666
- Hecking, T., Chounta, I.-A., & Hoppe, H. U. (2016). Investigating social and semantic user roles in MOOC discussion forums. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 198-207). doi: 10.1145/2883851.2883924
- Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65-70.
- Johnson, D. W. (1981). Student-student interaction: The neglected variable in education. Educational Researcher, 10(1), 5-10. doi: 10.3102/0013189X010001005
- Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638-654. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12107
- Kilgore, W., & Lowenthal, P. (2015). The human element MOOC: An experiment in social presence. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Student-teacher interaction in online learning environments (pp. 373-391). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Kim, J., Song, H., & Luo, W. (2016). Broadening the understanding of social presence: Implications and contributions to the mediated communication and online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 672-679. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12107
- Kizilcec, R., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK'13) (pp. 170-179). doi: 10.1145/2460296.2460330
- Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2013). Social and affective presence to achieve quality learning in MOOCs. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Vol. 2013, pp. 1977-1986). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA
- Kovanović, V., Joksimovic, S., Poquet, O., Hennis, T., Cukic, I., de Vries, P., ... Gasevic, D. (2018). Exploring communities of inquiry in massive open online courses. Computers and Education, 118, 44-58. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.010
- Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Buuren, H. (2011). Measuring perceived social presence in distributed learning groups. Education and Information Technologies, 16(4), 365-381. doi: 10.1007/s10639-010-9135-7
- Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., & Van Buuren, H. (2014). Community of inquiry: Social presence revisited. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 5-18. doi: 10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5
- Liu, S. Y., Gomez, J., & Yen, C.-J. (2009). Community college online course retention and final grade: Predictability of social presence. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2).
- Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In S. Dasgupta (Ed.), Social computing: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 113-128). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. (2011, April). Investigating students' perceptions of various instructional strategies to establish social presence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Lowenthal, P. R., Lowenthal, D. A., & White, J. W. (2009). The changing nature of online communities of inquiry: An analysis of how discourse and time shapes students' perceptions of presence. In M. Simonson (Ed.), 32nd Annual proceedings: Selected research and development papers presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Washington DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
- Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37(6), 631-661. doi: 10.1177/1046496406294322
- Maddrell, J. A., Morrison, G. R., & Watson, G. S. (2011, November). Community of inquiry framework and learner achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Educational Communication & Technology, Jacksonville, FL.
- Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149-159.
- Na Ubon, A., & Kimble, C. (2004). Exploring social presence in asynchronous text-based online learning communities. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education 2004 (pp. 292-297). IEEE.
- Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40.
- Poquet, O. (2017). Social context in MOOCs. (Doctoral thesis). University of South Australia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oleksandra_Poquet/publication/318529710_Social_Context_in_Massive_Open_Online_Courses/links/596f279da6fdcc24169467e3/Social-Context-in-Massive-Open-Online-Courses.pdf
- Poquet, O., Dowell, N., Brooks, C., & Dawson, S. (2018). Are MOOC forums changing? In LAK '18 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 340-349. doi: 10.1145/3170358.3170416
- Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
- Rodrigues, R. L., Ramos, J. L., Silva, J. C. S., Gomes, A. S., de Souza, F. da F., & Maciel, A. M. A. (2016). Discovering level of participation in MOOCs through clusters analysis. In 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), (pp. 232-233). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2016.45
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51-70.
- Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1-16. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
- Rovai, A., & Barnum, K. T. (2007). On-line course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. International Journal of E- Learning & Distance Education, 18(1), 57-73. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/121
- Shah, D. (2015, December 21). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2015. [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-2015-stats/
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, New York: Wiley.
- Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23-49.
- Swan, K. (2003). Developing social presence in online course discussions. Learning and Teaching with Technology: Principles and Practices, 147-164.
- Swan, K. (2004). Relationships Between Interactions and Learning in Online Environments. [Report]. The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://moodle.isle.ac.nz/pluginfile.php/2782/mod_data/content/19/Learning%20in%20on-line%20environments.pdf
- Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor, 2(24), 1-12.
- Tao, Y. (2009). The relationship between motivation and online social presence in an online class. (Doctoral dissertation). Available on ProQuest. Retrieved from http://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3871/
- Thomas, S. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 591-615. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2000.11778854
- Tu, C.-H. (2002). The Measurement of Social Presence in an Online Learning Environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34-45.
- Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150. doi: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
- Weaver, C. M., & Albion, P. (2005). Momentum in online discussions: The effect of social presence on motivation for participation. In H. Goss (Ed.), Proceedings ASCILITE 2005: 22nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Balance, Fidelity, Mobility-Maintaining the Momentum? (pp. 703-706). Brisbane, Qld.: Queensland University of Technology, Dept. of Teaching and Learning Support Services
- Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421-445. doi: 10.3102/00346543052003421
- Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2017). Explaining social presence and the quality of online learning with the SIPS model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.016
- Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rosé, C. P. (2013). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS data-driven education workshop (Vol. 11, p. 14). Retrieved from http://lytics.stanford.edu/datadriveneducation/papers/yangetal.pdf