Abstracts
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a research study on scientific software training in blended learning environments. The investigation focused on training approaches followed by scientific software users whose goal is the reliable application of such software. A key issue in current literature is the requirement for a theory-substantiated training framework that will support knowledge sharing among scientific software users. This study followed a grounded theory research design in a qualitative methodology. Snowball sampling as well as purposive sampling methods were employed. Input from respondents with diverse education and experience was collected and analyzed with constant comparative analysis. The scientific software training cycle that results from this research encapsulates specific aptitudes and strategies that affect the users’ in-depth understanding and professional growth regarding scientific software applications. The findings of this study indicate the importance of three key themes in designing training methods for successful application of scientific software: (a) responsibility in comprehension; (b) discipline; and (c) ability to adapt.
Keywords:
- blended learning,
- grounded theory,
- scientific software,
- training,
- distance learning,
- snowball sampling,
- purposive sampling
Appendices
Bibliography
- Adams, A., Davies, S., Collins, T., & Rogers, Y. (2010). Out there and in here: Design for blended scientific inquiry learning. In L. Creanor, D. Hawkridge, K. Ng, & F. Rennie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Association for Learning Technology Conference. "Into Something Rich and Strange: Making Sense of the Sea Change" (pp. 149-157). Nottingham, England: Association for Learning Technology. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/27397/3/out_there_and_in_here.pdf
- Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33, 1-4.
- Bainbridge, S. (2013). Development and evaluation of a pedagogical model for an open university in Nepal based on geographical, regional, and linguistic factors (Doctoral Dissertation), Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University. Retrieved from https://dt.athabascau.ca/jspui/bitstream/10791/33/1/Dissertation.Bainbridge%20Final%20Copy.pdf
- Bereiter, C. (1997). Situated cognition and how to overcome it. In D. Kirshner, & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 281-300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Bissell, C., & Endean, M. (2007). Meeting the growing demand for engineers and their educators: The potential for open and distance learning. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Meeting the Growing Demand for Engineers and Their Educators 2010–2020 International Summit (pp. 1-18). Munich, Germany: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Retrieved from https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.ieee-art-000004760382
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift fur Sociologie, 19(6), 418-427.
- Dearden, R. (1984). Education and training. Westminster Studies in Education, 7, 57-66.
- Fischer, G. (2009). End-user development and meta-design: Foundations for cultures of -participation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on End-user Development (pp. 3-14). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1530504
- Fischer, G. (2011). Understanding, fostering and supporting cultures of participation. Interactions, 18(3), 42-53. Retrieved from http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/2011/interactions-coverstory.pdf
- Frazier, L. J. (2006). A qualitative study of technology-based training in organizations that hire agriculture and life sciences students. (Master's thesis) College Station, Texas: Texas A & M University. Retrieved from http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/5917/etd-tamu-2006A-AGED-Frazier.pdf?sequence=1
- Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923640109527071
- Garrison, R. D., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
- Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (v. 2; pp. 13-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hannay, J. E., Langtangen, H.P., MacLeod, C., Pfahl, D., Singer, J., & Wilson, G. (2009). How do scientists develop and use scientific software? In Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Computational Science and Engineering, (pp. 1-8). Washington DC: IEEE Computer Society Washington. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1556928
- Harrison, D. J. (2015). Assessing experiences with online educational videos: Converting multiple constructed responses to quantifiable data. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 168-192. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1998/3205
- Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47-63. Retrieved from https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/hoepfl.html
- Holton, G. A. (2004). Defining risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 60(6), 19-25.
- Howison, J., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2011). Scientific software production: Incentives and collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 513-522). ACM. doi: 10.1145/1958824.1958904
- Hsin, W. J., & Cigas, J. (2013). Short videos improve student learning in online education. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28(5), 253-259. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2458622
- Hurt, A. C. (2007). Exploring the process of adult computer software training using andragogy, situated cognition, and a minimalist approach. In Proceedings of the International Research Conference in the Americas of the Academy of Human Resource Development (pp. 6-14), Indianapolis, IN, United States of America. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504840.pdf
- Joppa, N. L., McInerny, G., Harper, R., Salido, L., Takeda, K., O'Hara, K. ... Emmott, S. (2013). Troubling trends in scientific software use. Science, 340(6134), 814-815. doi: 10.1126/science.1231535
- Lingard, R. W. (2010). Teaching and assessing teamwork skills in engineering and computer science. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 8(1), 34-37. Retrieved from http://www.iiisci.org/journal/CV$/sci/pdfs/GQ816EX.pdf
- Ljubojevic, M., Vaskovic, V., Stankovic, S., & Vaskovic, J. (2014). Learning and quality of experience using supplementary video in multimedia instruction as a teaching tool to increase efficiency of learning and quality of experience. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 275-291. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1825/2903
- Lowe, J. S. (2004). A theory of effective computer-based instruction for adults (Doctoral dissertation). Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04132004-172352/
- Lutters, W. G., & Seaman, C. B. (2007). Revealing actual documentation usage in software maintenance through war stories. Information and Software Technology, 49, 576-587.
- McGreal, R. (2009). A case study of an international e-learning training division: Meeting objectives. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 1-20. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.619
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Moghaddam, A. (2006). Coding issues in grounded theory. Issues in Educational Research, 16, 52-66. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier16/2006conts.html
- Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1-19. Retrieved from https://sites.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/1_2Final/pdf/morseetal.pdf
- Parnas, D.L. (2010). Inside risks: Risks of undisciplined development. Communications of the ACM October 2010, 53(10), 25-27. doi: 10.1145/1831407.1831419
- Pawlik, A. Segal, J. Sharp, H., & Petre, M. (2012). Developing scientific software: The role of the Internet. In Tokar, A., Beurskens, M., Keuneke, S., Mahrt, M., Peters, I. Puschmann, C. ... & Weller, K. (Eds.), Science and the Internet (pp. 263-273). Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.
- Queiroz, F., & Spitz, R. (2016). The lens of the lab: Design challenges in scientific software. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 10(3), 17-45. Retrieved from http://ijgmpp.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.239/prod.94/m.2
- Rajendran, N.S. (2001). Dealing with biases in qualitative research: A balancing act for researchers. Paper presented at Qualitative Research Convention 2001 : Navigating Challenges. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya. Retrieved from http://nsrajendran.tripod.com/Papers/Qualconfe2001.pdf
- Robinson, H., Segal, J., & Sharp, H. (2007). Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice. Information and Software Technology, 49, 540-551. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0950584907000110
- Saldana, J. (2008). Coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- Segal, J. (2005). When software engineers met research scientists: A case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 10, 517-536. Retrieved from https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-005-3865-y
- Segal, J. (2007). Some problems of professional end user developers. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (pp. 111-118). Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States of America. doi: 10.1109/VLHCC.2007.17
- Skordaki, E. M. (2016). Mobilizing knowledge in science and engineering: Blended training for scientific software users (Doctoral Dissertation), Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University. Retrieved from https://dt.athabascau.ca/jspui/bitstream/10791/213/1/SKORDAKI%20EfrosyniMaria_EdDThesis%20-December%208th%202016_Final.pdf
- Skordaki, E. M., & Bainbridge, S. (2015a). Knowledge mobilization in scientific communities. Education Innovation & Research Symposium 2015. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297460865_Knowledge_Mobilization_in_Scientific_Communities_Blended_Training_for_Accurate_Application_of_Scientific_Software
- Skordaki, E. M., & Bainbridge, S. (2015b). Blended training and collaborative learning for software users in the geosciences. GeoQuebec Conference 2015: Challenges from North to South, September 2015, Quebec City, Canada. Retrieved from http://members.cgs.ca/documents/conference2015/GeoQuebec/papers/752.pdf
- Sloan D., Macaulay C., Forbes P., Loynton S., & Gregor P. (2009). User research in a scientific software development project. In Proceedings of the 2009 British Computer Society Conference on Human-Computer interaction (Cambridge, United Kingdom, September 01 - 05, 2009) (pp. 423-429). Swinton, UK: British Computer Society. Retrieved from http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_hci09_paper55.pdf
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Turner, D.W., III. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3) 754-760. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-3/qid.pdf
- Zacharia, Z. C., Manolis, C., Xenofontos, N., de Jong, T., Pedaste, M., van Riesen, S. A. N. ... Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: A literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 257-302. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/159959/