Abstracts
Abstract
Many undergraduate students continue to think of oral presentations as performances for an audience rather than dialogic exchanges of research. This focus on the aesthetics of performance, often promoted by speaking pedagogies in Canadian universities, can exacerbate classroom inequities by valuing certain ways of speaking and, by extension, certain speakers: speaking pedagogies, for example, that instruct students to speak “clearly,” dress “professionally,” or even to appear “confident,” can encode prejudices that privilege some voices and bodies over others, perpetuating discrimination based on gender, race, sexuality, language, ability, and culture. This article argues that an equitable scholarly speaking pedagogy needs to shift student thinking about academic oral presentations away from a focus on aesthetics and toward a view of scholarly speaking as part of a collaborative research process. The writing classroom, where similar changes have occurred in how we teach academic writing, is the best place to change students thinking about scholarly speaking. Drawing on genre-theoretical approaches to academic writing, we argue that this shift can be achieved by using “precedents”—recorded examples of scholarly speaking—to familiarize students with academic oral discourse’s genre conventions, helping students to recognize scholarly speaking as situated and dialogic. The article introduces a web resource, created by the authors, that uses precedents to encourage students and instructors to understand academic oral presentations as opportunities for cooperative research structured by shared discursive norms. Moreover, the site empowers students to challenge these norms, which might themselves encode biases. Ultimately, the site and the pedagogy that informs it not only challenge student prejudices about who can be a “good” speaker, but also remind students of their responsibilities—as speakers and audience members—to contribute to building an equitable classroom and university environment.
Keywords:
- oral presentations,
- scholarly speaking,
- genre,
- equitable teaching,
- critical pedagogy
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aristotle (1960). The rhetoric of Aristotle. Trans. Lane Cooper, Prentice.
- Bell, S. (2019). Learner-created podcasts: Fostering information literacies in a writing course. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 29, 51–63.
- Boromisza-Habashi, D. Hughes, J. M. F. & Malowski, J. A. (2016). Public speaking as cultural ideal: Internationalizing the public speaking curriculum. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 9(1), 20–34.
- Bryant, K. (2017). Interrogating conflicting narratives of writing in the academy: A call for research. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 27, 13–18.
- Burke, K. (1974). Philosophy of literary form. University of California Press.
- Dannels, D. P. & Housley Gaffney, A. L. (2009). Communication across the curriculum and in the disciplines: A call for scholarly cross-curricular advocacy. Communication Education, 58(1), 124–253.
- Dannels, D. P., Palmerton, P. R., & Housley Gaffney, A. L. (2017). Oral communication in the disciplines: A resource for teacher development and training. Parlor Press.
- Eaton, C. (2020). What can students tell us about ‘skill-building’ in Canadian writing studies? Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 30(1), 314–332.
- Elbow, P. (2012). Vernacular eloquence: What speech can bring to writing. Oxford University Press.
- Fassett, D. L. & Golsan, K. B. (2018). Reading between the lines: critical communication pedagogy and textbook development. In A. Ahmet & D. Trebing (Eds.), The discourse of special populations: Critical intercultural communication pedagogy and practice (pp. 39–54). Routledge.
- Fassett, D. L., & Warren, J. T. (2007). Critical communication pedagogy. SAGE.
- Flores, N. & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171.
- Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Introduction. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp. 1–24). Boynton/Cook Publishers.
- Giltrow, J. (2016). Writing at the centre: A sketch of the Canadian history. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 26(1), 11–24.
- Giltrow, J., Gooding, R. & Burgoyne, D. (2021). Academic writing: An introduction (4th ed.). Broadview.
- Goldstein, T. (2003). Teaching and learning in a multilingual school: Choices, risks, and dilemmas. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Graff, G. & Birkenstein, C. (2014). They say, I say: The moves that matter in academic writing (3rd ed.). W.W. Norton & Co.
- Graves, R. (1994). Writing instruction in Canadian universities. Inkshed Publications.
- Gullicks, K. A., Pearson, J. C., Child, J.T., and Schwab, C.R. (2005). Diversity and power in public speaking textbooks. Communication Quarterly, 53(2), 247–258.
- Gunn, A. M. (2007). Relational communication as a central focus for the “communication across the curriculum” initiative. Across the Disciplines, 4(1), 1–10.
- Harink, F. and Van Leeuwen, E. (2020). The art of presenting: Delivering successful presentations in the social sciences and humanities. Cambridge University Press.
- Inoue, A. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing writing for a socially just future. WAC Clearinghouse.
- Inoue, A. (2019). How do we language so people stop killing each other, or what do we do about white language supremacy? College, Composition and Communication, 71(2), 352–369.
- Kernbach, S., Bresciani, S. & Eppler, M.J. (2015). Slip-sliding away: A review of the literature on the constraining qualities of PowerPoint. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 292–313.
- Lee, J. W. (2016). Beyond Translingual writing. College English, 79(2), 174–195.
- Lippi-Green, R. (2011). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
- Lunsford, A. (2019, Jun. 2) Rethinking the writing/speaking relationship: What’s talk got to do with it? [Keynote Address]. Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing Annual Conference. Vancouver, BC.
- McMillen, P. S. & Hill, E. (2004). Why teach “research as a conversation” in freshman composition courses? A metaphor to help librarians and composition instructors develop a shared model. Research Strategies, 20(1–2), 3–22.
- Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–67.
- Motley, M. T. (1990). Public speaking anxiety qua performance anxiety: A revised model and an alternative therapy. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 5(2), 85–104.
- Motley, M. T. & Molloy, J. L. (1994). An efficacy test of a new therapy (“Communication-Orientation Motivation”) for public speaking anxiety. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22(1), 48–58.
- Oxford University Press. (n.d.). precedent, n. In Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved December 3, 2021, from https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/149572.
- Paré, A. (2009). Writing matters: Back to the future with rhetoric. Education Canada, 49(4), 4–8.
- Piller, I. (2016). Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
- Price, M. (2011). Mad at school: Rhetorics of mental disability and academic life. University of Michigan Press.
- Public speaking and presentation. University of Toronto School of Continuing Education. https://learn.utoronto.ca/programs-courses/courses/1349-public-speaking-presentation
- Presentation skills. Chapman Learning Commons. University of British Columbia. https://learningcommons.ubc.ca/student-toolkits/presentation-skills/
- Rickford, J. R., Sweetland, J., Rickford, A. E. and Grano, T. (2012). African American creole and other vernacular Englishes in education. Routledge.
- Rose, M. (1985). The language of exclusion. College English, 47(4), 341–359.
- Sabalis, S. (2017). Creating the museum experience: Using museum education to teach oral presentation skills in the composition classroom. Pedagogy, 17(1), 139–147.
- Sánchez, F. (2019). Trans students’ right to their own gender in professional communication courses: A textbook analysis of attire and voice standards in oral presentations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 49(2), 183–212.
- Selfe, C. L. (2009). The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing. College Composition and Communication, 60(4), 616–663.
- Simmons, J., & Wahl, S. T. (2016). Rethinking inclusion and diversity in communication education research. Communication Education, 65(2), 232–235.
- Stumm, B. (2021). Joining the Dialogue: Practices for Ethical Research Writing. Broadview.
- Swearingen, C. J. (2014). The new literacy/orality debates: Ebonics and the redefinition of literacy in multicultural settings. In L. Ouzgane & A. Lunsford (Eds.), Crossing borderlands: Composition and postcolonial studies (pp. 238–254). University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Walsh, L., Zytoskee, A.M., Ragains, P., Slater, H. & Rachal, M. The Burkean parlor as boundary object: A collaboration between first-year writing and the library. Composition Studies, 46(1), 102–123.
- Watson, M. (2018). Contesting standardized English: What harms are caused when we insist on a common dialect? American Association of University Professors, May–June. https://www.aaup.org/article/contesting-standardized-english
- Wilder, L. (2012). Rhetorical strategies and genre conventions in literary studies: teaching and writing in the disciplines. Southern Illinois University Press.
- You, X. (2016). Cosmopolitan English and transliteracy. Southern Illinois University Press.
- Young, V. A. (2004). Your average Nigga. College Composition and Communication, 55(4), 693–715.
- Young, V. A. (2021). Say they name in Black English: George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Atatiana Jefferson, Aura Rosser, Trayvon Martin, and the need to move away from writing to literacies in CCCC and rhetoric and composition. College Composition and Communication, 72(4), 623–639.