Abstracts
Abstract
This commentary details the shortcomings of the traditional healthcare ethics committee model in modern healthcare and argues for the necessity of professional clinical bioethicists to better meet modern healthcare’s ethics needs.
Keywords:
- bioethics,
- clinical,
- committee,
- ethics,
- expertise,
- healthcare,
- professional,
- quality
Résumé
Ce commentaire détaille les lacunes du modèle traditionnel du comité d’éthique des soins de santé dans les soins de santé modernes et plaide en faveur de la nécessité de bioéthiciens cliniques professionnels pour mieux répondre aux besoins éthiques des soins de santé modernes.
Mots-clés :
- bioéthique,
- clinique,
- comité,
- éthique,
- expertise,
- soins de santé,
- professionnel,
- qualité
Appendices
Bibliography
- 1. Hester DM, Schonfeld TL, editors. Guidance for Healthcare Ethics Committees. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
- 2. Ong YT, Yoon NY, Yap HW, et al. Training clinical ethics committee members between 1992 and 2017: systematic scoping review. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2020;46(1):36-42.
- 3. Fox E, Tarzian AJ, Danis M, Duke CC. Ethics consultation in US hospitals: Opinions of ethics practitioners. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2022;22(4):19-30.
- 4. Fox E, Danis M, Tarzian AJ, Duke CC. Ethics consultation in US hospitals: A national follow-up study. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2022;22(4):5-18.
- 5. Lee SW, Potter J, Matsler JS, Shields S. Demonstrating Value Through Tracking Ethics Program Activities Beyond Ethics Consultations. The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2020;31(3):259-67.
- 6. Fox E, Duke CC. Ethics consultation in US hospitals: determinants of consultation volume. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2022;22(4):31-7.