Abstracts
Abstract
There was a widespread belief among historians of science of my generation that high competence with regard to content and languages alone can guarantee better, more reliable results than can good philology combined with high competence in history or the other human sciences. In my casestudy of Wilbur R. Knorr’s analysis of several medieval Arabic and Latin texts on the balance, or steelyard, I highlight a variety of factors that compromised time and again his understanding and interpretation of his chosen texts. I conclude that a greater openness to more complex historiographical assumptions and more sophisticated methodological approaches as well as a greater willingness to contextualize documents in numerous dimensions before coming to conclusions about their specific meaning is crucial if we are to correct and improve upon work such as Knorr’s analysis of the Kitab al-qarastun, ascribed to Thābit ibn Qurra, and the Liber de canonio. The way forward is to enhance and temper philological analysis with solid analysis of scientific content within its relevant contexts.
Keywords:
- Islamic science,
- Mensuration,
- Thābit ibnQurra,
- Kitab al-qarastun,
- Liber de canonio,
- Wilbur E. Knorr
Appendices
Bibliography
- MS Beirut, St Joseph University, 223.
- MS Cracov, Jagielonska University Library, Mq 559.
- MS Florence, Biblioteca Laurenziana, Or. 118.
- MS London, British Library, India Office Library, 461.
- Ahlwardt, W. 1893. Verzeichnis der Arabischen Handschriften. Bd. 5: Ethik, Naturwissenschaften, Medizin 5387–6456. Die Handschriften-Verzeichnisse der Königlichen Bibliothek zu Berlin. Bd. 17. Berlin.
- Al-Dabbagh, J. al-D. 1966. Razvitie infinitezimal'nyh metodov na srednevekovom arabskom Vostoke. Moscow.
- Brentjes, S. and J. Renn. 2016. “A Re-Evaluation of the Liber de Canonio”. Pp. 119–149 in P. Caye, R. Nanni, and P. D. Napolitani edd. Scienze e rappresentationi saggi in honore di Pierre Souffrin. Atti del convegno internazionale Vinci, Biblioteca Leonardiana, 26–29 Settembre 2012. Florence.
- Busard, H. L. L. and M. Folkerts. 1992. Robert of Chester’s Redaction of Euclid’s Elements, The So-Called Adelard II Version. 2 vols. Basel.
- Charette, F. 1995. Orientalisme et histoire des sciences. L’historiographie européenne des sciences islamiques et hindoues, 1784–1900. Mémoire présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue d’obtenir du grade de Maître ès arts (M.A.) en histoire. Montreal.
- Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1956. Archimedes. Copenhagen.
- Dodge, B. 1970. The Fihrist of Ibn al-Nadim. 2 vols. New York.
- Duhem, P. 1905. Les origines de la statique. 2 vols. Paris.
- Fischer, W. 1972. Grammatik des klassischen Arabisch. Wiesbaden.
- Gacek, A. 2005. Arabic Manuscripts: A Vademecum for Readers. Handbook of Oriental Studies: Series 1. The Near and Middle East 98. Leiden.
- Heiberg, J. L. and E. S. Stamatis. 1972. edd. Euclides. Elementa. vol. 3. Leipzig.
- Heiberg, J. L. and E. S. Stamatis. 1972–1975. edd. Archimedis opera omnia. 3 vols. Stuttgart.
- Hogendijk, J. 1981. “How Trisections of the Angle were Transmitted from Greek to Islamic Geometry”. Historia Mathematica 8: 417–438.
- Jackson, D. E. P. 1970. The Arabic Version of the Mathematical Collection of Pappus Alexandrinus Book VIII: A Critical Edition. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Jaouiche, K. 1976. Le livre du Qarasṭūn de Ṯābit ibn Qurra. Paris.
- Knorr, W. R. 1982. Ancient Sources of the Medieval Tradition of Mechanics: Greek, Arabic and Latin Studies of the Balance. Supplemento agli Annali dell’Instituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza 2.
- Knorr, W. R. 1996. “The Wrong Text of Euclid: On Heiberg's Text and Its Alternatives”. Centaurus 38: 208–276.
- Lorch, R. 2008. Thābit ibn Qurra: On the Sector-Figure and Related Texts. Augsburg.
- Moody, E. A. and M. Clagett. 1952. The Medieval Science of Weights. Madison, WI.
- Rommevaux, S.; A. Djebbar and B. Vitrac. 2001. “Remarques sur l’histoire du texte des Éléments d’Euclide”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 55: 221–295.
- Sabit ibn Korra. 1984. Matematicheskie traktaty. Vol. 8 in B. A. Rozenfel’d, and A. P. Jushkevich edd. Nauchnoe Nasledstvo. Moscow.
- Sabra, A. I. 1987. “The Appropriation and Subsequent Naturalization of Greek Science in Medieval Islam: A Preliminary Statement”. History of Science 25:223–243. Repr. in pp. 3–27 of F. Jamil Ragep and S. P. Ragep edd. Tradition, Transmission, Transformation. Proceedings of Two Conferences on Pre-Modern Science held at the University of Oklahoma. Leiden/New York/Cologne, 1996.
- Suter, H. 1916–1917. “Über die Ausmessung der Parabel von Thâbit b. Kurra al-Harrânî”. Sitzungsberichte der physikalisch-medizinischen Sozietät zu Erlangen 48–49, 65–86.
- van Ess, J. 1991–1997. Theologie und Gesellschaft im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert Hidschra. Eine Geschichte des religiösen Denkens im frühen Islam. 6 vols. Berlin.
- Witkam, J. J. 2012. Formation of the Classical Islamic World. Burlington, VT/Farnham, UK.
- Woepcke, F. 1851. “Notice sur des traductions de deux ouvrages perdus d’Euclide”. Journal Asiatique 18: 217–247.