Abstracts
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is twofold: to give a good account of the argument from ignorance, with a presumptive argumentation scheme, and to raise issues on the work of Walton, the nature of abduction and the concept of epistemic closure. First, I offer a brief disambiguation of how the terms 'argument from ignorance' and 'argumentum ad ignorantiam' are used. Second, I show how attempts to embellish this form of reasoning by Douglas Walton and A.J. Kreider have been unnecessary and unhelpful. Lastly, I offer a full and effective account of the argument from ignorance and discuss the lessons of the analysis.
Keywords:
- ad ignorantiam,
- fallacies,
- ignorance,
- abductive reasoning,
- argument shemes
Résumé
Le but de cet article est double: donner un bon compte rendu de l'argument par l'ignorance, avec un schème d'argumentation présomptif, et soulever des questions sur certains aspects de l’œuvre de Walton, la nature des raisonnements abductifs et le concept de fermeture épistémique. Premièrement, j'offre une brève désambiguïsation de la façon dont les termes «argument par l'ignorance» et «argumentum ad ignorantiam» sont utilisés. Deuxièmement, je montre comment les tentatives de Douglas Walton et de A.J. Kreider d'embellir cette forme de raisonnement ont été ni nécessaires et ni utiles. Enfin, j'offre un compte-rendu complet et utile de l'argument par l'ignorance et je discute des leçons de l'analyse.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Blair, J.A. 1999. Review: D. N. Walton, Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Argumentation 13: 338–343.
- Copi, I. & Cohen, C. 1990. Introduction to Logic, 8th ed. New York: Macmillan.
- de Cornulier, B. 1988. Knowing whether, knowing who, and epistemic closure. In: M. Meyer (ed.) Questions and questioning. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- van Eemeren, F. and Grootendorst, R. 1987. Fallacies in Pragma- Dialectical Perspective. Argumentation 1: 283-301.
- The Guardian. 2004. There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. 07/10/2004.https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/07/usa.iraq1
- Kreider, A. 2016. Informal fallacies as abductive inferences. Logic And logical philosophy, 25: 73-82. Locke, J. 1690/1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Oaksford, M & Hahn, U. 2004. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2): 75-85.
- Tindale, C. 2007. Fallacies and argument appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pascal, B. 1670/1958. Pascal's Pensées. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.
- Wagemans, J. 2003. Conceptualizing fallacies: The informal logic and pragma-dialectic approaches to the argumentum ad ignorantiam. In: Proceedings of the fifth conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds). Amsterdam: Sic Sat
- Walton, D. 1985. New directions in the logic of dialogue. Synthese (63): 259-274.
- Walton, D. 1988. Burden of proof. Argumentation 2: 233-254.
- Walton, D. 1992. Nonfallacious arguments from ignorance. American philosophical quarterly 29(4): 381-387.
- Walton, D. 1996a. Arguments from Ignorance. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.
- Walton, D. 1996b. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. New York: Routledge.
- Walton, D. 1999a. The appeal to ignorance, or argumentum ad ignorantiam. Argumentation 13: 367-377.
- Walton, D. 1999b. Profiles of dialogue for evaluating arguments from ignorance. Argumentation 13: 53-71. Walton, D. Reed, C. & Macagno, F. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Woods, J & Walton D. 1978. The fallacy of 'Ad Ignorantiam'. Dialectica 32(2): 87-99.
- Wreen, M. 2000. Review: Douglas Walton (1995) Arguments from Ignorance. Argumentation 14: 51-56.
- Zarefsky, D. 2005. The study of effective reasoning. Chantilly, Virginia: The great courses.