Abstracts
Abstract
Community-university engagement is a growing field and takes many different forms. We explain and reflect critically on a community-university developmental process that we created to design a new non-profit studies undergraduate certificate. A steering group comprising students, non-profit organizations (NPOs), and faculty guided our process. We adopted a community-based, emergent, multi-tactic process that went from testing an idea, to collectively designing and co-constructing the certificate to building momentum to operationalize it, over an 18-month period. Our strategy was based on the convergence of three main bodies of literature—community-engaged scholarship, citizen participation, and naturalistic inquiry—and included seven tactics: community-university dialogues, e-communication, interactive booths in public places, presentations and learning circles, student research projects, student and NPO surveys, and pilot-testing undergraduate courses. The outcomes of our process revealed strong community support for a new certificate, which was then co-constructed and later approved by the University Senate. Today, five years later, we reflect on the ebb and flow of our process, in particular: emergent design challenges, the space-in-between, community/university black boxes, ownership, and facilitation work. This exploration contributes to the knowledge base on co-construction processes.
Keywords:
- community-university engagement,
- emergent design,
- knowledge exchange-creation-mobilization,
- non-profits,
- curriculum design
Appendices
Bibliography
- Akingbola, K. (2020). COVID-19: The prospects for nonprofit human resource management. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 11(1), 16–22. https://anserj.ca/index.php/cjnser/article/view/372/245
- Anyon, Y., & Fernández, M. (2007). Realizing the potential of community-university partnerships. The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(6), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.39.6.40-45
- Arnstein, S. (1969). Ladder of citizen participation. American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
- Barroll, M. (Host). (2022, March 1). “The Great Resignation”: Is it impacting Canada’s nonprofit sector? [Audio podcast episode]. In Charity Village Connects. https://charityvillage.com/charityvillage-connects-the-great-resignation-is-it-impacting-canadas-nonprofit-sector/
- Barth, T. (2018). Escaping the vines of the ivory tower: Reflections of an engaged professor. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 10(2), 9–19.
- Billan, J. (2015). VSSN certificate curriculum survey results and priorities. Luther College at the University of Regina. https://www.luthercollege.edu/university/academics/luther-programs/voluntary-sector-studies-network/research.
- Castle, K. (2014). The value of being porous: What universities and cities can do for each other. Academic Matters, OCUFA’s Journal of Higher Education. http://www.academicmatters.ca/2014/06/the-value-of-being-porous-what-universities-and-cities-can-do-for-each-other/.
- Clifford, D., & Petrescu, C. (2012). The keys to university-community engagement sustainability. Non-profit Management & Leadership, 23(1), 77–91.
- Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- DeSantis, G. (2013). Policy advocacy experiences of Saskatchewan nonprofit organizations: Caught between rocks and hard places with multiple constituents? The Canadian Geographer, 57(4), 457–473.
- DeSantis, G. (2014). Community-based research and advocacy for change: Critical reflections about delicate processes of inclusion/exclusion. In B. Jeffery, I. Findlay, D. Martz & L. Clarke (Eds.), Journeys in community-based research (pp. 53–72). University of Regina Press.
- DeSantis, G. (2015). Proposal for a new undergraduate certificate in nonprofit sector leadership and innovation (NSLI). Luther College at the University of Regina.
- Evans, M., McDonald, J., & Nyce, D. (1999). Acting across boundaries in aboriginal curriculum development: Examples from Northern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 23(2), 190–205.
- Fay, J. (2003). You can’t check your power and privilege at the door: Some lessons in post-modern social justice coalition-building. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 52, 139–143.
- Goulet, L. (2011). Community-based research: Relationships are foundational. In B. Jeffery, J. Episkenew & P. Migliardi (Eds.), Community-based health research summer institute: Final report (pp. 180-182). Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit, Indigenous People’s Health Research Centre and Prairie Community-Based HIV Research Program.
- Grabb, E. G. (2007). Theories of social inequality (5th ed.). Nelson/Thomson Canada.
- Hall, B. (2011). Towards a knowledge democracy movement: Contemporary trends in community-university research partnerships Rizoma freireano, instituto paulo freire de espana, 9. http://www.rizoma-freireano.org/index.php/towards-a-knowledge-democracy-movementcontemporary-trends-in-community-university-research-partnerships--budd-l-hall
- Hall, M., Andrukow, A., Barr, C., Brock, K., de Wit, M., Embuldeniya, D., Jolin, L., Lasby, D., Levesque, B., & Vaillancourt, Y. (2005). The capacity to serve: A qualitative study of the challenges facing Canada’s nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
- Hall, M., de Wit, M., Lasby, D., McIver, D., Evers, T., Johnston, C., McAuley, J., Scott, K., & Murray, V. (2004). Cornerstones of community: Highlights of the national survey of nonprofit and voluntary organizations (Catalogue no. 61-533-XIE). Ministry of Industry, Statistics Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/61-533-x/2004001/4200353-eng.pdf?st=ybgExAi8
- Harkavy, I., & Hartley, M. (2012). Integrating a commitment to the public good into the institutional fabric: Further lessons from the field. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(4), 17–36.
- Hatala, A., Erickson, L., Isbister-Bear, O., Calvez, S., Bird-Naytowhow, K., Pearl, T., Wahpasiw, O., Engler-Stringer, R., & Downe, P. (2017). The interpersonal skills of community-engaged scholarship: Insights from collaborators working at the University of Saskatchewan’s community engagement office. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship,10(1), 44–58.
- Hicks Peterson, T. (2009). Engaged scholarship: Reflections and research on the pedagogy of social change. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 541-552.
- Hollweck, T., Netolicky, D. M., & Campbell, P. (2021). Defining and exploring pracademia: Identity, community, and engagement. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 7(1), 6–25. http://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2021-0026
- Horowitz Gassol, J. (2007). The effect of university culture and stakeholders’ perceptions on university–business linking activities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(5), 489–507. HR Council for the Nonprofit Sector. (2010). The state of leadership development: An exploratory study of social service charities in Alberta and Saskatchewan.
- HR Council for the Nonprofit Sector. (2011). Current state of skills development: The Canadian nonprofit sector.
- HR Council for the Nonprofit Sector. (2012). Skills development: Using evidenced-based information to inform practice.
- Hurlbert, M., & Gupta, J. (2015). The split ladder of participation: A diagnostic, strategic, and evaluation tool to assess when participation is necessary. Environmental Science and Policy, 50, 100–113.
- Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics and inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 887–907). SAGE Publications.
- Key, K., Furr-Holden, D., Lewis, Y., Cunningham, R., Zimmerman, M., Johnson-Lawrence, V., & Selig, S. (2019). The continuum of community engagement in research: A roadmap for understanding and assessing progress. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 13(4), 427–434.
- Kincheloe, J., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed., pp. 303–342). SAGE Publications.
- Kniffin, L., Camo-Biogradlija, J., Price, M. F., Kohl, E., Williams, J., Del Conte Dickovick, A., Goodwin, A., Johnson, K. V., Clayton, P. H., & Bringle, R. G. (2020). Relationships and partnerships in community-campus engagement: Evolving inquiry and practice. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 8(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.18586
- Laforest, R. (2011). Voluntary sector organizations and the state. UBC Press.
- Lantz, P., Israel, B., Schulz, A., & Reyes, A. (2006). Community-based participatory research: Rationale and relevance for social epidemiology. In M. Oakes & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Methods in Social Epidemiology (pp. 239–266). Jossey-Bass.
- Lewington, J. (2017, Mar. 14). How universities are working to shatter the ivory tower. MacLeans. http://www.macleans.ca/education/university/how-universities-are-working-to-shatter-theivory-tower/.
- Lin, C. Y., Loyola-Sanchez, A., Boyling, E., & Barnabe, C. (2020). Community engagement approaches for Indigenous health research: Recommendations based on an integrative review. British Medical Journal Open, 10, e039736. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039736
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
- McIsaac, E., Park, S., & Toupin, L. (2013). Shaping the future: Leadership in Ontario’s nonprofit labour force. Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation, University of Toronto. http://mowatcentre.ca/pdfs/mowatResearch/88.pdf.
- Mulholland, E., Mendelsonh, M., & Shamshiri, N. (2011). Strengthening the third pillar of the Canadian union: An intergovernmental agenda for Canada’s charities and non-profits. Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation, University of Toronto. http://www.mowatcentre.ca/pdfs/mowatResearch/30.pdf.
- Nasmyth, G., Etmanski, C., & Lehr, S. (2016). Opening the web of learning: Students, professors, and community partners co-creating real-life learning experiences. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 9(2), 92–102.
- Nichols, N., Phipps, D., Gaetz, S., Fisher, A. L., & Tanguay, N. (2014). Revealing the complexity of community-campus interactions. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 69–94.
- Ochocka, J., Moorlag, E., & Janzen, R. (2010). A framework for entry: PAR values and engagement strategies in community research. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 3, 1–19.
- Petter, A. (2017, September 21). Engagement may be a matter of survival. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/opinion/engagement-may-be-matter-survival.
- Powell, T. (2013). Making healthy minds healthy bodies: An activity-theoretical analysis of the development and organizational adaptation of a medical service-learning program [Doctoral dissertation, University of California]. UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b3922zb
- Pratt, K. (2017). Celebrating C3’s creativity: Stakeholder engagement in evaluation of the Chicago conservation corps. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 10(1), 109–119.
- Ragoonaden, K., & Mueller, L. (2017). Culturally responsive pedagogy: Indigenizing curriculum. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(2), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v47i2.187963
- Ratsoy, G. (2016). The roles of Canadian universities in heterogeneous third-age learning: A call for transformation. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(1), 76–90.
- Renwicka, K., Selkrig, M., Manathunga, C., & Keamy, R. (2020). Community engagement is … : Revisiting Boyer’s model of scholarship. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(6), 1232–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1712680
- Runnels, V. (2011). Experiences of governance in the context of community-based research: Structures, problems and theory [Doctoral dissertation, University of Ottawa]. uO Research. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/19936/1/Runnels_Vivien_Eileen_2011_thesis.pdf
- Seifer, S. (2003). Documenting and assessing community based scholarship. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 429–435). Jossey-Boss.
- Siemens, L. (2012). The impact of a community-university collaboration: Opening the “black box”. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 3(1), 5–25.
- Stein, J. G. (2007). The university as citizen. Academic Matters: The Journal of Higher Education. https://academicmatters.ca/assets/AM-Oct-2007-Issue.pdf.
- Strandberg, C. (2017). Maximizing the capacities of advanced education institutions to build social infrastructure for Canadian communities. J.W. McConnell Family Foundation’s RECODE Initiative and Simon Fraser University. https://mcconnellfoundation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Maximizing-Capacities-of-Advanced-Education-Institutions-to-Build-Social-Infrastructure.pdf.
- Taylor, A., & Kahlke, R. (2017). Institutional logics and community service-learning in higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(1), 137–152.
- Tembo, D., Hickey, G., Montenegro, C., Chandler, D., Nelson, E., & Porter, K. (2021). Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research. British Medical Journal, 372, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n178
- Tremka, A. (2015). Students’ perceptions, knowledge and expectations of voluntary/non-profit sector courses and careers. Luther College at the University of Regina. http://www.rcenetwork.org/portal/sites/default/files/VSSN_Student_Survey_Results_30Sept2015_FINAL.pdf.pagespeed.ce.2YFsuHL14A.pdf.
- Tremka, A., & Karman, H. (2015). Post-secondary education programs on the voluntary sector in Canada: A preliminary environmental scan. Completed for course IDS 290AC – Mixed STRATEGYs research on the voluntary sector. Luther College at the University of Regina. https://www.rcenetwork.org/portal/sites/default/files/VSSN%20Cross-Canada%20Scan%20on%20Voluntary%20Sector%20Programs%20-%20Sept2015%20FINAL1.pdf.
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the truth and reconciliation commission of Canada. National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation, University of Manitoba. http://nctr.ca/assets/reports/Final%20Reports/Executive_Summary_English_Web.pdf.
- Vaillancourt, Y., & Aubry, F. (2017). The Québec Act to combat poverty and social exclusion: A case of democratic co-construction of public policy. In N. Mulé & G. DeSantis (Eds.), The shifting terrain: Non-profit policy advocacy (pp. 200–229). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Vaterlaus, M., Skogrand, L., Higginbotham, B., & Bradford, K. (2016). Sustaining university-community partnerships in providing relationship education. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 9(2), 34–41.
- Vogt, R. (2016). Academia meeting the needs of industry: A case study of developing a new degree program for petroleum engineering [Doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota]. UND Scholarly Commons. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2081/
- Wenger, L., Hawkins, L., & Seifer, S. (2012). Community-engaged scholarship: Critical junctures in research, practice, and policy. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(1),171–181.